sreca pa mi je slika na obn kao mlijeko od hrt nista niti ocekujem

...izgleda da je Lamar konačno odlučio...

That said, here's the usual run-down on what Odom will bring to next season's Lakers.

Pros: Simply put, Odom can do just about everything he puts his mind to. Rebound, handle, run, jump, shoot from long range, post-up, pass and defend. All this at either the small forward or the power forward positions — and even playing center in selected matchups.

More specifically, he can drive effectively both ways but prefers going left — and therefore works very hard (mostly with a nifty right-to-left crossover) to get back to his left hand. He's quite a handful when he posts on the right block and looks for his lefty jump hook or turnaround jumper. And he's learned to be aggressive when playing without the ball.

Cons: His habitual lack of focus is a problem. Too often, Odom will disappear and not be a factor whatsoever. This happens perhaps one out of every three games in the regular season and one game per playoff series. Also, his 3-ball stroke can be flat. Plus, he exhibits too much ball and body movement at the stripe and is therefore little better than a lifetime 70 percent shooter from there, which is slightly below the average league-wide efficiency.

Prognosis: With both Odom and Ron Artest in the fold, the Lakers are heavy favorites to repeat. All they need to round out their roster is another lively big man off the bench — Josh Powell doesn't fill the bill — and a guard/wing who can provide another reliable scorer off the bench. It could very well be, however, that if Adam Morrison's leg has healed and fully regained its strength, he could be the secondary scorer for the second unit.

Note: The Lakers would have had absolutely no chance to re-sign Odom if there was an NBA franchise in Hershey, Pa.

Let's also look at the most significant of the latest player relocations.

Andre Miller, left, will force the Blazers into a more patient offense. Emeka Okafor, right, is a questionable acquisition for New Orleans. (Ned Dishman / Getty Images)

Andre Miller to Portland

Pros: He's strong, smart and can run an offense with clockwork efficiency. When he must, Miller can also overpower opponents and create his own shots. His hesitation moves enable him to consistently get to the hoop and finish. Has incredible court vision and a great drive-and-kick game. Can do a good job defending screen/rolls.

Cons: Cannot run, shoot from long range or defend any but the slowest point guards in one-on-one situations.

Prognosis: Miller's presence will force the Blazers to play a more deliberate style than they have in recent years. This will put even more pressure on Greg Oden to hasten his development. So even with Miller, Portland's future still depends on Oden.

Matt Barnes to Orlando

Pros: He's a high-energy player who can run the floor like a guard. Barnes' quick hops also make him an effective rebounder and an outstanding finisher. He has excellent 3-point range and rarely misses open shots.

Cons: Takes far too many ill-advised shots, especially in fast-break or early offensive situations. His lefty handle is weak. Worst of all, Barnes is a below-average defender.

Prognosis: If he learns to differentiate between good shots and bad ones, Barnes could be a streaky but potentially dynamic scorer off the bench. A probable plus for the Magic.

Jamario Moon to Cleveland

Pros: This guy is one of the best all-around athletes in the league. He can run, jump and change direction like a Hall of Famer. Moon is a highlight finisher on the break. Can also knock down treys and play aggressive defense.

Cons: His incredible skills remain somewhat unsophisticated. Doesn't see the court well enough to make judicious passes and he makes mucho mistakes in executing half-court sets.

Prognosis: If the Cavs can get him to slow down and look before he leaps, Moon could be a huge addition who greatly enhances their championship hopes.

Tyson Chandler to Charlotte

Pros: A quick jumper and eager shot-blocker, especially when coming from the weak side. Can outrun most other centers. Does a good job of spinning off of top-heavy interior defenders and making himself available for lob passes. Except for some lefty jump hooks, put-backs, and duck-under moves, Chandler's primary offense is generated by his slipping screens and dunking the resultant lob passes.

Foul prone and injury prone, Tyson Chandler is likely to frustrate Larry Brown. (Doug Pensinger / Getty Images)

Cons: Is very soft and can be bullied. Can't pass or score when stationed in the low post but gets upset when he doesn't get sufficient touches. When opposing players take the ball right at him and then execute a convincing pump fake, Chandler is so intent on blocking shots that more often than not he'll commit a foul. Is both foul prone and injury prone. A poor free-throw shooter.

Prognosis: Is the perfect eraser in a zone defense, and the perfect backup. Unless the Bobcats come up with a more stalwart starting center, Larry Brown will be hard on Chandler's case all season long.

Emeka Okafor to New Orleans

Pros: Big, strong body and sure-handed rebounder. Will block his share of shots.

Cons: His post-up moves are very crude and depend more on power than technique. A poor passer, Okafor is a turnover looking for a place to happen. Has trouble defending opponents who can face-up and go. Another below-average shooter from the stripe. Lacks the foot speed to provide Chris Paul with the screen/roll options that Chandler did. Is grossly overpaid.

Prognosis: Plays better without the ball than with it. Could turn out to be the kind of lane-clogger that will limit the flexibility of the Hornets' half-court offense.

Drew Gooden to Dallas

Pros: Plays hard. Likes to post-up on left box and execute either his go-to move — a right-handed jump-hook — or a turnaround jumper. Also looks to spin on his drives. Can rebound, handle some, and block an occasional shot.

Cons: Is a streaky shooter who stubbornly tries to shoot his way through dry spells. Has slowed down to a noticeable degree and since he's always had trouble defending quick players off the dribble, his defense is now highly questionable.

Prognosis: Gooden is a career under-achiever and the Mavs are the seventh team he'll play with during the course of his (soon-to-be) nine years in the league. As such, Dallas is the latest outfit to believe it can prompt Gooden to fulfill his potential. Could be a useful player off the bench who should be quickly yanked when he misses three shots in succession.

i to pravu odluku će izgleda donijeti

Šteta mi je za Portland i njihov probali deal za Hinricha. On je čvršći igrač igarč od Millera s više tempa i boljom obranom što je neophodno za šamionske momčadi, pogotovo kad još imaju Roya koji je praktički combo. baš me zanima šta će biti s tim Baylessom kada mu toliko vjeruju. A dodatno i dalje nisu napravili nikakv trade za na 2-3 pozicijama gdje imaju 5 igrača, Roy, Webster, Fernadez, Batum i Outlow, što je najmanje 1 previše, kao i na playu gdje su uz Millera Blake i Bayless.

...evo objavljen je raspored utakmica za sezonu 2009/10., otvaraju Cavsi doma protiv Bostona 27.listopada...

Za fanove smiješnih hlača:

My Top 10 Favorite Knicks Ever

So with no recent news other then the Knicks getting 5 nationally televised games to hype up next summers free agent class I decided to make a list. Not just any list, my favorite Knicks ever.

10. Nate Robinson

Nate has brought a lot to this team over the years whether fans want to admit it or not. Nate is a 2x Slam Dunk champion and really the face of the Knicks the last few years. He’s a high-energy guy who you love to have off the bench, but when you give him extended minutes it accelerates the aging process quite fast. Watching Nate’s dunks and speed up and down the court has been a treat and hope to see him return this fall.

9. Mark Jackson

Mark is probably my 2nd favorite PG’s in Knicks history and you’ll read who’s ahead of him later. Jackson was a great ball handler and leader. He is a former Rookie Of The Year and ran the Knicks better then anyone before him. His court vision was astounding and really made players like Ewing and Houston a lot better with his passes and defense.

8. David Lee

Regardless of what Lee does this offseason, he’s been my favorite Knick since his tenure here. Lee’s abilities don’t match the likes of Ewing or Oakley, but his hustle and tenacity has elevated his game to a much higher level then I believe possible. He comes out every night and is a double-double machine. And who can forget his buzzer beater tip in? When Lee walks off the court each game he is one of the few players in the league who you’re sure gave it there all. Keep it up Lee.

7. Stephon Marbury

Is there really much to say about this guy? He was basically kicked out of New York for previous circumstances with D’Antoni and was forced to sit out games because he wasn’t wanted when the likes of Duhon was in the starting lineup. Marbury was the last player to take the Knicks to the playoffs and will hold that mark until at least next season. Marbury is a funny guy and really got a bad rap in New York. He was fun to watch, regardless of how bad the supporting cast was. And if you haven’t been watching his webshow you’re missing out.

6. Latrell Sprewell

Yeah, he’s on welfare now and not really a guy to look up to but Sprewell was the last Knick to carry this team to the NBA Finals. Sprewell was nothing short of excellent in New York and making the Finals as an 8th seed is just unheard of. A large part of that success goes to Sprewell and I still love watching his highlights, excluding the missed layup against the Spurs.

5. Larry Johnson

Larry Johnson. How can you describe the guy? He’s electric on and off the court and really brought a lot to the game. What he brought to this city was critical to the Knicks playoff runs in the 90’s. Johnson was a treat to watch and one of the best in Knicks history.

4. Charles Oakley

Oakley was a Knick for 10 years, but left just one year before our big run. It was sad to not have him around just because of how great Oakley/Ewing was in the post. Oakley’s personality was unique and his antics are forever engraved in Knicks fans minds.

3. John Starks

Starks was never “The Guy” on the Knicks and never got a lot of praise for his abilities. Starks was one of the best 6th men ever to play the game. His speed and agility often matched Ward’s but never really got into that starter mold. Starks was great and the closest version to him in today’s game would be Bobby Jackson. Both could start or come off the bench and be effective.

2. Patrick Ewing

Perhaps the greatest Knick ever. Ewing was as a Knick for 15 years and was one of the most dominant big men to ever enter the game. Although there is still speculation on how the Knicks ended up with Ewing, I still commend Stern for the pick and sealing the deal for a bright future. Ewing is a great guy and coach and is doing wonders for Howard in Orlando. It’s unfortunate he was never offered the head coaching gig here this past season.

1. LeBron James

…Gotcha!

1. Allan Houston

Houston is without a doubt my favorite Knick ever. Houston was a 3 point ace and one of the best shooters in Knicks history. Houston’s game was how I modeled my own. Coming of screens for a 3. Houston may not have been a superstar, but he was consistent and was never afraid to shoot. It was a sad day when I found Houston just couldn’t leave the game. He would play forever if he could and I really admire that.

rashard lewis suspendiran na 10 tekmi (počevši od prve tekme orlanda u sezoni) radi korištenja nekih nedozvoljivih supstanci

koji mu q