I have added back the famous tag you removed due to major concerns over the relevance and objectivity of the criteria and the fact that the list is far far too long. I have the following concerns about the criteria:

• Played at least 100 league games for the club - This is fine, as it would require a significant number of seasons to achieve, but should be balanced by consideration of the number of players who could achieve it. If it is many then the required games should be increased as the longer a list, the less notable any given player on it is by definition.
• Scored at least 20 league goals for the club - this is not a good inclusion criterion as it could be accomplished in one season.
• Topped the club's goalscoring chart in any season - this is an even worse criterion as in a particularly poor season, the top scorer may only achieve a handful of goals
• Played at least one international match for their national team (not necessarily while playing for Rijeka) - this is also a poor criterion, why should a player who was capped at another club but not a Rijeka be notable for Rijeka when he achieved nothing on the international scene while at Rijeka? If anything it indicates that his worth to the national team went down.
• Played at least ten league games for the club when they were league runner-ups (1998–99 and 2005–06) - another poor criterion, firstly, ten games, which could be all a player ever played for the club is not very much, secondly it is an arbitrary decision and thirdly, they did not actually win the league so I am unsure why this makes them particularly notable.
• Played in at least one of the club's 10 national cup final matches - Another poor criterion which requires a player to only actually play in one game to appear on this list
• Played in one of the six historic European matches against Juventus, Real Madrid and Stuttgart - not an acceptable criterion at all, who is saying these are historic matches? It is OR to make such a claim and again requires a player to only make one appearance for the club to qualify for inclusion.

I also have a major, wider, concern about the length of the list, it is far far too long for such a section. The number of players on it inherently indicates that they are not actually that notable. Given that there are already two sourced listings for all-time XIs, what is the need for this huge list anyway? Please don't remove the tag without addressing these concerns. My view is that this listing should be removed entirely. It is a considerable piece of work and I do not wish to rile anyone, so if my concerns aren't addressed, then I propose the issue be taken to WT:FOOTY to gain consensus. Fenix down (talk) 11:14, 1 September 2013 (UTC)