https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cvg173ldgnmo

Wirtz looked offside. And he was - just. So why was his goal allowed to stand after a VAR review?

In the first two seasons of VAR there were some very confusing offside decisions. The lines drawn to the defender and the attacker would be on top of each other.

There were many complaints that this was against the spirit of the offside law.

So from the start of the 2021-22 season all leagues added a tolerance level, or benefit of the doubt, of about 5cm to the old offside technology. It meant that if the two lines touched, the player would be given onside regardless of the on-field decision.

i onda tu toleranciju, koja nije nikad bila iskomunicirana, odluče provizorno primijenjivat kako im paše

moja teorija je da su zajebali gol Wirtza i naknadno su se pokušavali izvući s ovim izgovorom

kako god da okreneš, nesposobna banda

s tim da je naknadno var sustav upgrejdan, pa ove fantazije o 5cm sad više ionako nebi trebale vrijediti