Ovo je razgovor nakon sto VAR suci utvrduju da je bio faul na Rayi. Prije toga kazu da ce skrenuti pozornost sucu na Trossarda i Ricea, ne da su penali, nego da im se ne svida sto Trossard ne gleda loptu. U nijednom trenutku ne kazu da je faul za penal. Dapace, za kontakt Ricea kazu da je faul na golmanu bio prije. 

Iz razgovora se vidi da su pokazali sucu sve sto su mu planirali pokazati i da je on donio ispravnu odluku, s cim se slazu manje vise svi, pa cak i hejteri Arsenala, kao Neville i sl. 

Ali cijenim trud...

AVAR: I don't like Trossard not facing the ball and you've got…

AVAR: I agree, it's impactful, it's just everything else that's going on as well.

AVAR: Let's say we're saying that's a foul, then what are we saying about Trossard's actions on the same player?

AVAR: What are we saying about Declan Rice behind?

VAR: Yeah.

VAR: He still gets a hand to the ball, doesn't he? When he's getting to the ball.

AVAR: What's your initial opinion as you watched it?

VAR: I think, for me, we send him for an on-field review to look at the possible foul on the goalkeeper.

VAR: And then we get him to look at the other incidents as well. I think that's the best decision in terms of this.

VAR: OK.

VAR: Chris (Chris Kavanagh - REF), I'm going to recommend an on-field review for a possible foul on the goalkeeper but there are some other incidents to look at while you're at the monitor as well.

REF: OK.

VAR: So, I'm going to show you a possible foul on the goalkeeper.

RO: This angle?

REF: OK.

VAR: The left arm of Pablo comes across Raya and holds on to the left arm of Raya as he goes to win the ball.

REF: Yeah.

VAR: I'm showing you that now.

REF: I can see the clear holding on him across.

VAR: Yeah, but then I'm just going to show you some, obviously, other angles on that incident, of players.

REF: OK.

AVAR: You've got Declan Rice and you've got Trossard.

REF: I don't know what you're trying to show me, give me a clue.

VAR: Trossard on Pablo. Just if you look at Trossard on Pablo. Give me a better angle on that.

VAR: I'll get you a better angle.

REF: I don't think there's much in that at all, I'm happy with that.

VAR: Yeah, OK.

REF: That's nothing.

VAR: And then if you just want to consider the actions of Declan Rice on Mavropanos at the back.

VAR: But the foul happens on the goalkeeper before.

REF: Before it, so… After review, West Ham number…

VAR: 19.

REF: 19. Foul.

REF: Just confirm his number again for me.

VAR: 19.

VAR: Yeah, confirmed.

REF: Mic open.

REF: After review, West Ham number 19 commits a foul on the goalkeeper. Final decision is direct free-kick.

A moze i usporedba s nesudenim kontaktom na utakmici Everton - City

https://youtube.com/shorts/Ug8ib_RsDfU?is=9rL1bPNyhc4BHP3u

Svaka cast.

Zapravo, gledajuci suđenje u PLu i raznorazne kontroverzne VAR situacije koje smo imali vidjeti, ovo mi je zapravo bila mozda o najkvalitetnija VAR obrada neke situacije koju sam do sada vidio.

Svaki su potencijalni faul vidjeli i proanalizirali, sucu su rekli za moguci faul Trossarda i uputili ga na to. Nisi bili sigurni za to. On je ukratko rekao "that's nothing".

Ajde, ne mogu reci da nije nista, ali vidio je to, dosudio odluku..

Melem uglavnom, za razne situacije gdje uopce cesto nisu ni gledali kljucnu situaciju, a sudili su neke sporedne.

Pa normalno da je vama super odluka, Troussard ne gleda loptu i hrva se s Todibom i to je "it's nothing" 😂

Kako si opsjednut Arsenalom, nevjerojatno nesta da ne vjerujes zdravim ocima..

Pa ostati će te u ligi zahvaljujući Arsenalu.

Sve im je bilo dobro dok je Arsenal bio mekana i pičkasta ekipa kojom su se svi rugali...

Sad kad se igra "muški", ne valja opet. 

Psi laju, a karavane prolaze.

Ako Arsenal osvoji naslov, to će biti naplata za sve one generacije koje su ostale za korak kratke. Jedna od prvih koja mi pada na pamet, i antologijski Walcottov trk na Anfieldu...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DxeTTW9rP4