Roland Garros 28.05.-11.06.2006

Krokodil
Krokodil
Potencijal za velika djela
Pristupio: 28.04.2006.
Poruka: 1.301
12. lipnja 2006. u 00:35
bas super interviews

[quote="roger"]

Q. You said that you played better for sure in Rome, probably also in Monte‑Carlo. What about Nadal? Do you think he played well today or not that well also him compared to the other two?

ROGER FEDERER: Look, it's a Grand Slam final. It's not Monaco, Rome finals. That obviously changes. That you could see in his approach to the first set. He was not as comfortable because obviously the pressure is high, and it took him a while, you know, to get used to that. But once he got into the match, I knew over five sets he will, he will be very, very strong.

I mean, my feeling tells me about his game, he will always bring a certain level of play, same as Lleyton, you know. But he never really goes out of total extremes, you know, where you have absolutely no chance. Where with me and maybe other players like Safin, Roddick, it's different. We can play a much higher level.

So he's a different kind of a player. For me, it's harder to relate to him than maybe Hewitt. I don't know.[/quote]



a Nadal




[quote="Nadal"]

Q. Beyond the 6‑1 against Federer, the others all have 8‑love, 8‑1 against Federer. You are his only rival. To become No. 1, you said it depended on Federer. Doesn't it depend also on other players who can challenge Federer? Maybe they can take pressure off of you. Am I clear?

RAFAEL NADAL: It's true that if Federer loses no matches whatsoever, I will not be No. 1. I have to improve. But with the points that I'm winning, if Federer hadn't been there, I would have been No. 1. But we are at a time when the No. 1 is the most consistent player of the whole tennis history, so you have to take this into account.

Secondly, I believe that he's at the top of the game for two years. He's playing his best tennis. He will not be able to play that way all his life. It's true for me also, but I'm a bit younger. I can prepare myself well, and maybe when he will come down a little bit, then I might be able to have the sufficient level to become No. 1.[/quote]



i kao i uvjek novinari pitaju ko idioti...


[quote]

Q. After the match you were lying on the clay. What did you think?

RAFAEL NADAL: I was thinking about nothing.

Q. What emotions did you have?

RAFAEL NADAL: Nothing.

Q. Do you realize you were not thinking about anything?

RAFAEL NADAL: What do you want me to think about? You just don't feel the tension anymore. I didn't even realize I was falling on the ground. I didn't fall myself on the ground. I just fell. I didn't think about it before.[/quote]




a za Rogera


[quote]

Q. I want to know how disappointed are you right now? You don't look that disappointed, and yet...

ROGER FEDERER: I can. I can if you'd like (smiling).

Q. I'm sure you're disappointed. Can you try and explain how disappointed you are.

ROGER FEDERER: I mean, I have no other choice than to accept the fact, right? I mean, so...

.

.

.

Q. Could you talk a little bit more about that second set. What happened? You had a pretty clean first set, and then some errors came in. What happened in the second?

ROGER FEDERER: You didn't watch, or? No, seriously, I mean.

Q. I wanted to hear it from you.

ROGER FEDERER: Well, you should have watched the match then because, I mean...[/quote]





ivor
ivor
Moderator
Pristupio: 05.02.2003.
Poruka: 7.826
12. lipnja 2006. u 00:44
Do you realize you were not thinking about anything?



ovo je prestrašno, pitanje stoljeća
⚜️⚜️⚜️
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 01.05.2003.
Poruka: 6.347
12. lipnja 2006. u 00:46

    

Ovo je sjajno.

bojangles
bojangles
Dokazano ovisan
Pristupio: 19.01.2005.
Poruka: 16.414
12. lipnja 2006. u 08:41
 mijenjam Nadala,njegovih 60 pobjeda na zemlji,njegovu gadljivu odjeću (mora da se dopada Istrijanima uz unutrašnjosti,Zg finfekima i Grobničanima),njegovu gadljivu igru i nepostojeći personality za jedan top-spin backhand Guillerma Vilasa...jedino što je vrijedilo jučer je onaj kadar Jennifer Anniston  
Because of a few songs wherein I spoke of their mystery-women have been exceptionally kind to my old age
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 14.03.2006.
Poruka: 34.766
12. lipnja 2006. u 10:17
Evo upravao san procitala sve vase komentare i pari mi masu glupo kad kazete ah Nadal je dobia jer je Federer previse poklanja. Pitanje je zasto je Federer napravia tolike EU. Stvar je u tome da Nadal sve vata tako da ti napaci kompleks i pocnes raspaljivat u nadi da on nece uvatit,a u biti bacis u out!
Svaka cast Nadalu-sve izbaci iz takta,cak i velikog Rogera!! Svaka cast i Shaggy-u na pogotku. Sva srica ipak nisan uplatila kladionicu
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 14.03.2006.
Poruka: 34.766
12. lipnja 2006. u 10:18
khaderach je napisao/la:
sutra grlom i živcima uz federera

ubi,ubi..nadala,nadalaaaa,nadaalaaaa

mislim,ona navijačka
Vidi cijeli citat


Dobro si me nasmija. Svaka cast!!!
 
[uredio nikita]
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 14.01.2004.
Poruka: 838
12. lipnja 2006. u 11:05

U prva dva seta je Nadal imao 1:1 i protiv Mathieua i protiv Hewitta i protiv Federera, ali kako je vrijeme odmicalo niko mu nije mogao priprijetiti u zavrsnoj fazi meca i vjerujem da ce njegov niz biti prekinut na nekom manjem turniru gdje se igra na dva dobijena seta, na tri na sljaci je trenutno nepobjediv.

Roger je imao lijepu priliku da u trecem setu kod 2:1 napravi break. Imao je 0:40, a na 30:40 i zicer koji rijetko promasuje. Da je to iskoristio ko zna kako bi mec dalje isao i mislim da je tu prelomljeno... Previse promasaja i ovo je ipak dokaz da se Roger stegne kad igra protiv Nadala, kao sto i veliki broj ljudi koji igraju protiv njega ne pruze maksimum nego izgube bez velike borbe. Nadal definitivno ne moze na travi dobiti Rogera, ali na betonu i dvorani vec ne zna sto bih rekao posto ce Roger sigurno imati u glavi 1:6 i bez obzira sto je vecinu od tih poraza pretrpio na zemlji ipak ce to njega opterecivati na US openu ili gdje vec budu igrali sljedeci mec. Cini mi se da ce se u buducnosti sve manje postavljati pitanje Roger ili Pete, a sve vise Roger ili Rafa posebno jer su obojica mladi i jer se Roger popravlja, a Rafa na brzim podlogama.

Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 14.03.2006.
Poruka: 34.766
12. lipnja 2006. u 12:14
  Ne znan zasto su se odi svi okomili na Rafu,al cinjenica je ta da momak ima tek 20 god,a u rukama ima 2 Grand Slama i sigurno nije slucajno da je 5 puta krknia Carobnjaka iz Basela. Nadal ima jako puno prostora za napredak. Pitan se sta ce bit ako unaprijedi servis i volej i ako bude zdrav!!!

PS; Ljubo mi vec pomalo ide na zivce sa glupin komentarima kad izgubi. Prvo je crnia Hewitta,pa Roddicka,a sad Nadala. Stvarno pretjeruje!!!
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 20.04.2005.
Poruka: 7.318
12. lipnja 2006. u 12:24
A neke je pljuvao i prije meca - nalbandian u shangaju. 
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 01.05.2003.
Poruka: 6.347
12. lipnja 2006. u 12:25
 Meni su najjače njegove izjave da se osjeća ko 2. igrač svijeta.....first, koga briga kako se ti osjećaš, a i kraj živog Federera i Nadala nikad neće biti No. 2.
  • Najnovije
  • Najčitanije