Did Donaghy fix Game 3 of Suns-Spurs?
There aren't many dark days in the Valley of the Sun in mid-summer, but Friday must have been pretty gloomy.
Just when Phoenix Suns fans were moving through the acceptance phase of
their grief over last year's unjust playoff exit comes another knee to
the groin.
As
if the playoff suspensions of Amare Stoudemire and Boris Diaw (in
exchange for instigator Robery Horry) hadn't been a big enough
miscarriage of justice, now comes news that NBA referee Tim Donaghy is
under FBI investigation for betting on basketball. There are even
allegations of mob ties.
While those charges have yet to be
proven, there is very little debate among the basketball cognoscenti as
to what was the most dubiously officiated game in this spring's
playoffs. It was Game 3 of the Suns-Spurs Western Conference semifinals
on May 12.
It was a bewildering carnival of bad calls, bad non-calls and egregiously late calls.
Who did that game? Eddie F. Rush, Greg Willard and Tim Donaghy.
The
Suns' gut-wrenching six-game loss to the Spurs had already plunged
their fans into the grief cycle, only then it was due largely to David
Stern's failure to insert a measure of mitigating sanity to his
zero-tolerance bench-leaving policy.
First, Game 3 will have to be put under a microscope. Hard to
believe it will look any better under a jeweler's loupe than it did on
TV.
Off the top of my head, the worst non-call — after Bowen
forced a turnover by chopping down on Nash's off hand as the point
guard was crossing over — came right in front of Rush, not Donaghy.
One
other critical officiating error was a whistle on a clean block by
Stoudemire, who played only 21 minutes due to foul trouble.
And
then there was the whistle delivered from Shangri-La. The Suns had
forced a miss, secured the ball and were pushing it up court when a
foul was called, retroactive to the shot attempt. If it turns out that
Donaghy made this particular call — after having a couple of seconds to
think about it — it will look very bad.
The Spurs were favored by
four in Game 3 and won by seven, 108-101. They shot nine more free
throws than the Suns, a perfectly reasonable gap between an
interior-scoring team and a jump-shooting team. While the risk of
fixing a playoff game is increased by the closer scrutiny of the game,
it is easier to place large bets without setting off red flags because
there's much more money being wagered on a playoff game than a regular
season game.
If Donaghy is convicted of fixing any games over the
last two seasons — during which the FBI was monitoring his games — how
will Stern, who must have precious little credibility in Phoenix, ever
convince Suns fans that they weren't the victims of a fix? I mean,
besides the one he himself sanctioned after Game 4. (And if it turns
out Donaghy did conspire to fix Game 3, how happy will Suns fans be
with the FBI for allowing their team to be an unwitting victim in a
two-year-old sting operation?)
For years Stern has been
dismissing the cries of conspiracy theorists and fining anyone who
dared open his mouth about the officiating. He even went so far as to
threaten to throw Jeff Van Gundy out of the league.
If during a criminal court proceeding it comes to light that Donaghy
was influencing the outcome of games, is Stern prepared to return any
fine money levied against a player, coach or owner who criticized what
turned out to be crooked officiating?
Former Orlando Magic coach
Brian Hill was fined $25,000 after complaining bitterly about the
officiating in a game Donaghy did on March 6, 2006.
Stern could
conceivably return that fine money if it turns out Donaghy was in the
bag. But what if evidence emerges that Donaghy had money on the Spurs
in Game 3?
If that's the case, Stern's refusal to adjudicate the
Horry-Stoudemire-Diaw non-fight fairly will have compounded a criminal
act. How could he ever make things right in Phoenix?
He might start by awarding Phoenix, one of the finalists, the 2009 All-Star Game. But would he dare show up?
Suns fans may still be grieving.