NBA draft

madmax17
madmax17
Većinski vlasnik Foruma
Pristupio: 28.04.2007.
Poruka: 28.249
06. kolovoza 2013. u 21:17
Ima i par Hrvata

Under 18 European Championships: Top Prospects

Turkey took home the 2013 U18 European Championships after narrowly defeating Croatia -- a team missing their superstar, Mario Hezonja, due to injury. Spain won the bronze-medal game in a thriller against Latvia. Despite the loss, the Latvians showcased an interesting tandem of mobile big men.

Here is a list of the top NBA prospects:

Kristaps Porzingis (1995, 6-11, PF, Latvia, Cajasol Sevilla)

Porzingis was the best big-man prospect of the competition. HKristpas Porzingise's very skinny, but has excellent size for his position. He also possesses long arms and big hands, with good athleticism. He’s really fluid and mobile for his height, but he definitely needs to bulk up.

Despite his height, he prefers to play on the wing, showing amazing body control and ball-handling skills, even if his frame causes him to lose balance after contact or when he tries to take position in the post. He can put the ball on the floor with confidence, easily blowing past centers and power forwards off the dribble. He has good hands and good outside shooting range, but he must improve on his offensive skills, particularly in the post.

Porzingis reminds some scouts of a taller Andrei Kirilenko. On the defensive side, he possesses great shot-blocking timing, averaging five per game during the tournament. Has the height of a center (if not the strength quite yet), and he moves like a guard. He finished the competition with 11.6 points and 10 rebounds.

Kenan Sipahi (1995, 6-6, PG, Turkey, Tofas Bursa)

Sipahi won the tournament's MVP award with his combination of athleticism, explosiveness and creativity. Standing 6-foot-6, he has excellent size for a combo guard, with good muscular definition, especially in his upper body. He has a lighting-quick first step and the ability to create his own shot, even if he sometimes tends to get out of control. This leads to a high number of turnovers per game (2.8 in Riga tournament).

Sipahi is still rather raw when it comes to game comprehension and play-making ability, and his decision making needs serious improvement. On the other hand, his ceiling is very high on both ends of the court. He has quick hands and a great motor, and he consistently puts in a strong effort on the defensive side. He still needs to work on his positioning and fundamentals. After Hezonja, he's one of the prospects with real upside in the ’95 generation. He closed the tournament with 10.9 points 3.8 rebounds and five assists.

Anzejs Pasecniks (1995, 7-0, C, Latvia, VEF Riga)

Pasecniks was one of the tournament's biggest surprises. He has a great body for the center position, with good structure to go along with his height. He’s mobile and skilled, with good post moves, both on the baseline and in the middle of the painted area. He has a good range from 15-16 feet when served in catch-and-shoot situations, but most of his game is based below the boards. His offensive development has still some room for further improvements.

On the defensive side, he’s able to protect the rim, but he tends to be foul prone, since he needs to work on his positioning and timing for blocks. He probably has a brighter future as an NCAA prospect than as an NBA one, but he's certainly a big man worth tracking for the future. He closed with 12.6 points and 7.7 rebounds.

Agusti Sans (1995, 6-4, PG/SG, Spain, Joventut Badalona)

Sans was the key cog for the Spanish team that clinched the third spot after two heart breaking games against Turkey in the semifinal and Latvia in the final for the bronze. In fact the Catalan guard showed all his poise and clutch ability, taking all the key shots and leading the team from a vocal standpoint. During the competition he showed his athleticism and great scoring instincts, combined with a remarkable rapidity and good height for the role. He has great body control leading the break with effectiveness and showing the ability to finish at the basket even when off balance. He has a slasher type of game, he drives to the basket basically in any condition, thanks to a lighting first step, but he’s really effective especially in transition. He has astonishing defensive instincts, with quick hands and a good sense for passing lanes. He’s definitely not a selfish player, with great passing instincts, even if sometimes he has turnover problems. His main shortcoming his the lack of a consistent jump shot, and of a reliable 3 point shot, even if when served in catch and shoot situations he can be quite effective. He's also not the most fluid athlete. He finished the tournament with 12.3 points, 3.6 rebounds and 2.3 assists.

 

Ilimane Diop (1995, 6-11, C, Spain, Caja Laboral Vitoria)

 

Diop is a mobile big man with a tremendous wingspan that makes him a reliable shot blocker. He’s still raw, both from a technical and physical standpoint, but his frame should allow him to put on weight in the next few years. Plus, he possesses good instincts for the game, with a good base of skills and a soft touch, even from midrange.

He needs to work on defensive balance and timing, since he’s often foul prone. He was one of the best players during 2011 U16 European Championships, but he hasn’t developed as expected since then, especially with his offensive fundamentals and rebounding. He finished the tournament with 8.9 points and 6.9 rebounds.

Damien Inglis (1995, 6-7, SG/SF, France, INSEP)

Inglis hasn’t shown significant development since NJIT Finals in London, combining his typically astonishing physical skills (primarily his great athleticism and speed) with poor shooting and overall game comprehension. He’s already a grown man from a muscular standpoint, especially in the upper body. Plus, he has big, strong hands. Thanks to his structure, he has the ability to withstand contact and attack the basket without issue at youth level, often generating and-1 opportunities. He likes to create with the ball in his hands, especially attacking the basket in isolation situations. At this level, Inglis can use his speed and physicality to slash to the rim. He projects as a great defender on any level, due to length, lateral speed and strength.

His main shortcoming is his poor shooting ability, especially from outside the 3-point line. Right now, his game is based on physical domination. When the talent level of his opponents increases, his offensive effectiveness could be limited. As in Riga, his performance in this tournament was not remarkable, despite his strong all-around stats (11.8 points, 7.4 rebounds 3.9 assists).

James Birsen (1995, SF, 6-7, Turkey, Fenerbahce)

Birsen has shown his ability to play multiple backcourt positions, but the feeling is that he may have simply stopped developing. He has a natural feel for the game, combined with great passing instincts and court vision, especially in transition. On defense, he has good instincts, working effectively in passing lanes for steals.

Despite all of his strengths and perceived ceiling, there is a big concern about his streaky jump shot and average explosiveness. He has trouble beating defenders off the dribble. During the tournament he barely attacked the basket, waiting to be served outside the 3-point line by his teammates. Birsen is still a huge talent, but he needs help from a mental standpoint, as he seems to have really lost his confidence. He finished the competition with 11.6 points 7.8 rebounds and 1.9 assists.

Karlo Zganec (1995, PF, 6-8, Croatia, KK Zagreb)

Zganec was the hidden leader of his team, collecting stellar all-around numbers during the tournament: 13.3 points, 9.1 rebounds and 2.9 assists. Standing 6-8, he’s a bit undersized for the power-forward position, struggling against bigger and taller players defensively. This shortcoming is offset by his quickness and mobility, which allows him to defend small forwards and even shooting guards.

Offensively, he lacks elite post moves, but he’s skilled and polished. He shows a complete offensive repertoire, both from midrange and below the boards. He has great instincts and game comprehension. In fact, he was close to double digits in rebounds, thanks to his sense of positioning and timing. Zganec is prospect with a limited upside, but he's definitely ready to compete at a solid pro level.

Luke Nelson (1995, 6-2, PG, England, UC Irvine)

Nelson is a long, athletic point guard with impressive physical skills for the point-guard position. He’s a little bit skinny right now, but due to his age, he has plenty of time to develop. He’s lighting with the ball in his hands, with an impressive repertoire of crossover moves that allows him to beat just about any defender in transition at this level quite easily.

Sometimes he tends to over-dribble, leading to turnovers -- especially when the tempo on the floor decreases in half-court game. His playmaking skills are still rather raw, as he needs to add some maturity and consistency to his game. His shot is inconsistent, too, especially from 3-point range. Next year, he’ll play at the NCAA level with UC Irvine. He concluded the competition with 19 points, 3.4 rebounds 2.2 assists.

Lovro Mazalin (1997, 6-8, SF, Croatia, Cibona Zagreb)

Despite being the youngest player of the competition (two years under the cutoff age), Mazalin was one of Croatia's most effective players, showing advanced skills and maturity. He’s a strong, crafty point forward with a high basketball IQ and game comprehension. He has average explosiveness and leaping abilities, but he should definitely be considered a solid athlete, especially given his solid frame. He’s a natural scorer, with a wide variety of offensive solutions (attacking the basket, catch and shoot, midrange jumper). Plus, he has a smooth shot and perfect mechanics.

Despite being so effective from a scoring standpoint, he also has great passing instincts and court vision, combined with a wise shot selection. His quick first step allows him to beat forwards at this age, making him a difficult matchup. In order to develop his possibilities as a NBA prospect, he should work on his body and lateral speed. He closed with 10.4 points 5.7 rebounds 1.3 assists. He is already one of the top European prospects of his generation.

Domantas Sabonis (1996, 6-10, PF, Lithuania, Unicaja Malaga)

Sabonis showed his solid fundamentals, great passing instincts and a reliable hook shot, as he was consistently effective under the boards. He’s long and mobile for his height, but he needs to work on his body control when he attacks the basket, since he tends to lose balance during contact. He’s a good athlete, but nobody would call Sabonis explosive. His mobility allows him to run the floor well, with great effectiveness in secondary transition situations.

He needs to increase his shooting range and improve his ball handling in order to become a more effective offensive player. The main concern, though, is his mental toughness. Sometimes, he struggles to manage pressure -- possibly due to the difficulties to live up to the pressure of his surname. He closed the competition with 14 points and 11.4 rebounds.

Rade Zagorac (1995, 6-7, SG, Serbia , Mega Vizura Belgrade)

Zagorac is a tall, skinny guard with an amazing wingspan for his position and big hands. He’s not excessively fast on the court, but he’s able to effectively put the ball on the court. He is reliable in catch-and-shoot situations, a skill that is more effective for him right now than attacking the basket, since he lacks speed. His passing skills and game comprehension are above average. He exploits his height advantage to pass over the top of defenders and he's always looking to set up his teammates for easy shots.

His main shortcomings are physical. He struggles with quicker opponents and he absolutely needs to bulk up, but he is a prospect with a ceiling and upside worth tracking. He closed with nine points 4.3 rebounds 1.7 assists.

Okben Ulubay (1997, 6-7, SF, Turkey)

This lefty was the second-leading scorer for the first-place squad from Turkey. He shows an advanced mid-range game, good athleticism and above-average length. He is very young and shows good scoring ability. He plays point forward, but he is quite turnover prone at this point. He shows loads of potential, due to his driving and shooting ability. Think of Ulubay as a Hedo Turkoglu-type if he can continue to develop. Birsen received the same comparisons and hasn't.

He still has a long way to go, so his development over the next few years will be critical. Turkey doesn't have the best track record developing young guys. He lacks the hype of Lovro Mazalin, but some scouts feel he could end up better.

??Marc Garcia (1996, 6-6, SG, Spain) ??

His body and face make him look even younger than his listed age. Garcia seems to have a lot of physical growth left in him based on his hands and feet, but he will need to work on adding strength. He has the desire that some other Spanish players seem to lack. At 6-foot-6, the big question is whether he can develop the leaping ability to stay with NBA athletes. He appears to be among the best under-17 scorers in Europe based on this event.

 

Marko Arapovic (1996, 6-10, PF/C, Croatia, Cibona Zagreb)

Arapovic showed his solid fundamental with solid footwork, great body control, and good body strength for his age. The most impressive part in his game is his shooting ability. He is very adept at the pick and pop, and is the prototypical stretch big man with his abilty to consistently make shots behind the three point line. Arapovic has good rotation and arc in his shot; some scouts have compared his shooting ability to former Duke player Ryan Kelly. While his foot work is solid he has limited athleticism that obviously hurts his chances for the NBA. But a big man with his fundamental skills and shooting ability is worth monitoring.
[uredio madmax17 - 06. kolovoza 2013. u 21:21]
"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast!" 🎸⚽🏀🎨
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 18.01.2012.
Poruka: 118
06. kolovoza 2013. u 21:24
zar ozbiljno? sta nije draft 2013 tek prosao, a vi vec o 2014? i o tome kako ce neki nas nadobudni talent koji ima 17 godina bit na tome?

sad smo tu procitali gomilu komentara o maloljetnicima zapravo. nije li zubcic bio novi larry bird, statijaznamtko?
madmax17
madmax17
Većinski vlasnik Foruma
Pristupio: 28.04.2007.
Poruka: 28.249
19. siječnja 2014. u 12:38
1.
min
shabazz Joel Embiid 7-0 250 C Kansas Fr. Early in the year the thought was that Embiid could be drafted in the top 5 based on potential. He was expected to show flashes and put up numbers sporadically. But he has progressed much faster than anyone expected and in general has been an even bigger factor than Wiggins. He's also showing better consistency, a stronger motor and making more of an impact. Rumors began in the summer that Coach Self was calling Embiid and not Wiggins his best long term prospect, though some felt that was a motivational ploy for Wiggins. Apparently not.... It's extremely rare to find a kid with his package of attributes. It is sacrilegious to compare anyone to Olajuwon, a giant leap of faith, but for Embiid the comparison appears it actually fit as there really aren't many high level 7-foot athletes with the skill level that he has a chance to develop. He's not as athletic, but he could develop a similar offensive game, and has better size. He's got a tremendous basketball body with not only great athleticism but the ability to add size and strength to his frame. The fact that he's shown an ornery side and has been willing to mix it up is only seen as a positive by scouts. He already shows signs of being an enforcer defensively with his length, explosiveness and timing on blocks. He just needs to learn discipline on fakes and how to stay out of foul trouble and he will be a force. Embiid is a raw talent who has come a long way in a very short time. Scouts who saw this kid 2 years ago African Basketball without Borders event marvel at just how much he's improved in such a short time. He shows terrific form and touch on his shot, plus amazing footwork, giving his potential as an offensive center real intrigue. He's in a tremendous program to develop under Bill Self and would do himself a great service by staying for more than one season of development, but that is beginning to look pretty unlikely with the progress that he has shown thus far. His ability to be a two way impact player puts him above Bari and #1 on our board. NBA Comparison: Akeem Olajuwon
2.
min
shabazz
Jabari Parker 6-8 235 SF Duke Fr. Parker may lack the long term potential of a Joel Embiid or the freakish athleticism of an Andrew Wiggins, but his offensive polish and maturity makes him a highly regarded prospect. If a team values readiness over potential, Parker should be the choice. He's both polished and versatile and understands what it means to be a professional having grown up around the game with his father a former standout, Sonny Parker. He remains incredibly humble as well as focused and hard working. Parker is a much better athlete than he appears at first glance. He's also sure to blow away the competition during team interviews, as he's incredibly mature and well spoken. Parker may lack Wiggins' freakish athleticism, but he possesses sneaky athleticism and a much more polished all-around game at this point. Parker lacks great foot speed and some scouts are worried about his ability to defend on the perimeter. He's hit wall as Conference play has begun, but part of the problem can be attributed to the fact that Duke has no size and they're asking him to defend players bigger and stronger than himself regularly. He reminds people of Melo (without the drama) or a shorter, stockier Durant. NBA Comparison: Carmelo Anthony
3.
zeller
Andrew Wiggins 6-8 200 SF Canada Fr. Wiggins is as physically talented as any wing player to come along since LeBron James. He has so much raw potential and talent that he still has only begun to scratch the surface in terms of skill development and realizing his abilities. But some feel he may fall way short of all the expectations. It's a long season and it's likely that he will hit some bumps in the road, but how he responds to adversity and plays in the big games is will be the key to whether scouts buy into his potential and he will be considered for the top pick. Right now Embiid and Parker have clearly passed him on most team's draft boards. NBA Comparison: Rudy Gay
4.
uu
jones
Marcus Smart 6-4 225 PG Oklahoma St. So. Smart is a "different kind of dude", as one scout put it, speaking about his maturity and decision to stay in school and bypass the draft in which he would have likely been a top 2-3 selection in 2013. Smart was playing the PG position solely for the first time in his career, so detractors must keep in mind that the holes to his game are still developing. He may always struggle to stay in front of elite point guards, but then again everyone does. Smart displayed his improved shooting and scoring ability with his 39 point outburst against Memphis. He's a natural leader and the kind of player that makes everyone around him better just with his presence. He always seems to be a step ahead of the competition with a feel for the game that is very advanced for his age. Comparing Smart to past NBA guys is very difficult, as he's such a unique player. NBA Comparison: Jason Kidd
5.
mcadoo
Julius Randle 6-9 240 PF Kentucky Fr. Randle is a rare talent in that he combines raw power with a high skill level. Randle is Kentucky's top prospect in a year in which many consider to be Coach Calipari's greatest recruiting haul. He's proven to be virtually unguardedly for any single college player. His combination of power and skill set him apart and make him a big time post prospect for the NBA level. His on court mannerisms have caused some to question his focus, however he's received positive reviews from scouts about his willingness to be coached and learn. In high school he got a little too enamored with facing the basket and his post game needed some polish, but he has been virtually unstoppable around the basket at UK. NBA Comparison: Derrick Coleman
6.
t
mitchell Dante Exum 6-6 185 PG/SG Australia Fr. Exum is the biggest wildcard of this year's draft. He's a terrific kid with a great deal of talent, but without question he's still very unproven as his biggest accomplishments have been in the form of international competitions such as the Hoop Summit where he matched up with Aaron Harrison. He also has been very impressive playing for his Australian national team in competitions such as the U19 World championships in Prague. He's got a ton of upside due to his versatility to play either guard position and extreme quickness off the dribble, and has drawn comparisons to Penny Hardaway, Had Shabazz Muhammad sat out the year and not been "exposed", a number of scouts feel he would have ridden the hype into being a top 3-5 pick in 2013. Exum has the same kind of hype behind him and could end up a top 5 pick, a la Enes Kanter without ever playing at the college level. He has some kinks to work out such as a shot that lacks much trajectory. He also much prove himself playing off the ball and playing within more of a team context as opposed to having carte blanche as he does leading his Aussie team. NBA Comparison: Penny Hardaway
7.
phi
jones
Gary Harris 6-4 205 SG/PG Michigan St. So. Harris is a sophomore who plays with unusual maturity and poise. Though a tad undersized at 6'4, Harris has solid length, athleticism and great quickness. He also shows a textbook shooting form and consistency from deep. The cerebral guard flirted with the idea of turning pro as a freshman in such a weak class, however his shoulder troubles would have likely dropped him further than where he would have liked. He appears to be fully healthy now and has started to hit his stride mid way through the year. His ability to potentially be a combo guard gives him added intrigue. NBA Comparison: OJ Mayo
8.
jones
Rodney Hood 6-8 210 SF Duke So. There were actually scouts that prior to the season predicted that Hood would leapfrog Parker and go higher in the draft. Obviously that was before everyone realized just how talented Parker was, but it shows just how highly Hood was and is regarded. The Mississippi State transfer has tremendous outside shooting as well as being an above athlete with a polished all around skill level. He and Parker have their work cut out for them as Duke's bare frontcourt forces them into playing post defense. One of Hood's main areas of weakness is lack of physicality and strength so it will be interesting to see how he responds. NBA Comparison: Rashard Lewis
9.
uu
mitchell
Zach LaVine 6-4 180 PG/SG UCLA Fr. How shocking has LaVine's climb into the lottery been? He wasn't even ranked as a top 50 high school senior last season. Despite the national hype around Arizona's Aaron Gordon, it's LaVine that is actually the Pac 12's top freshman and prospect. While he has trailed off some of late, LaVine is finally garnering a great deal of national exposure recently. He's got a highly intriguing combination of explosiveness and shooting ability. A second year in Westwood to get stronger and work on his PG skills would be beneficial. But if he continues to play at his current rate it will be difficult to turn down being a potential top 10 selection after just his freshman season. NBA Comparison: Russell Westbrook
10.
marshall
Jerami Grant 6-8 215 SF/PF Syracuse So. In terms of readiness, Grant could be looked at similar to the freshmen projected in the later half of the first round. Grant is the son of former NBA forward Harvey Grant, twin brother of Horace Grant. He's a high level athlete with great length and quickness. His offensive game has shown solid development thus far at Syracuse, but he will play a secondary role with CJ fair being the team's go to scorer. Jerami shows a lot of potential but whether he puts things together and plays with enough consistency to be a first rounder this year remains to be seen. He has been very impressive over the last month of December and beginning of January. NBA Comparison: Thaddeus Young
11.
henson
Glenn Robinson III 6-6 200 SF Michigan So. Robinson returns for his sophomore season and will assume a larger leadership role with the departure of Trey Burke. He's an excellent athlete with basketball bloodlines as the son of a former #1 overall pick. He will look to springboard off an excellent freshman season and become a more complete and consistent player as a sophomore. He's got solid all around skills, utilizing tremendous leaping ability and good strength to defend and rebound and contribute outside of scoring. Becoming better at creating shots for himself and a more consistent shooter will help solidify him as a possible mid lottery pick for this year's draft. NBA Comparison: Andre Iguodala
12.
young
[Player: Jordan Clarkson] 6-5 190 PG Missouri Jr. Clarkson is a big, smooth point guard who has taken over the Missouri offense after transferring from Tulsa. He shows the ability to get teammates involved as well as create his own offense. Whether or not he can sustain a high enough level of play to grab a late lottery pick remains to be seen. But scouts that have seen him in practices and games in the early part of the season have come away extremely impressed with him.NBA Comparison: Michael Carter-Williams
13.
min
jones Tyler Ennis 6-2 180 PG Syracuse Fr. A strong case could be made that Ennis (and not Parker) is the most valuable freshman in the country. He has led the Cuse to an undefeated record through mid June. Amazing to think that Syracuse didn't even know who their PG would be going into this season before Ennis blew up at the U19 World Championships in Prague in July. Ennis has been arguable the most consistent point guard in the country, and although he lacks elite level athleticism, he does a good job of changing speeds and getting by defenders and to the rim. He's very good at finding teammates for baskets while on the move and shows impeccable decision making. his command of the PG position and decision making are truly special for a college freshman, and throw in the fact that he's got good touch and a promising mid range game, and Ennis will likely be faced with a decision following the season with a chance to be a lottery pick after just one year in college. NBA Comparison: George Hill
14.
min
jones
James Young 6-6 210 SG Kentucky Fr. Young has one of the purest strokes in college basketball and he also happens to be a prototypical 6-foot-6, athletic two guard, which is music to the ears of NBA scouts. He may go through growing pains and hit the proverbial freshman wall at times, but he's UK's second best prospect and shows a lot of competitive fire. Look for Young to have a big season and join the long line of UK's one and done lottery picks. He has the look of a future NBA starting 2 guard and could even become an All Star level player if things fall into place with his skill set and future team (situation). NBA Comparison: Michael Redd
15.
u
jenkins Doug McDermott 6-7 225 SF Creighton Sr. In today's NBA, having one standout skill can be better than being just good in many areas. McDermott is an elite level shooter with a tremendous feel for the game. Scouts have pegged his range as a likely 12-18 mid first rounder going into the season. A player that can spread the floor as well as pass and compete at a high level will fit right into many teams. McDermott may never be a good defender due to lack of foot speed and athleticism. But his offensive arsenal should be enough to make up for that. NBA Comparison: Jason Kapono
16.
u
zeller
Noah Vonleh 6-9 240 PF Indiana Fr. Vonleh has had a surprisingly quick transition to the college level. He's a forward who has spent a lot of time working on his handle but seems to have realized that his bread and butter at the NBA level lies in the paint. He lacks much in the way of post moves and is just a raw physical specimen at this point. But he's a bright, coachable kid who works hard and should continue to improve as the season progresses. A second year in Bloomington would figure to help him immensely, yet if he's still being projected this high in April, it may be difficult to follow that course. NBA Comparison: Jamal Mashburn
17.
min
zeller TJ Warren 6-7 220 SG/SF NC State So. Warren is a talented wing with a nose for scoring. He has spring boarded off of a solid freshman campaign to become one of the most prolific scorers in the country. He's an NBA level athlete who shows a knack for taking what the defense gives him and one of those guys that makes the game look easy. He still needs to extend his range and add a 3 point shot to his repertoire, but he shows good form on his shot and should be able to improve that over time. NBA Comparison: Caron Butler
18.
zeller
Vasilije Micic 6-5 200 PG Serbia 1994 While Micic isn't the fleetest of foot, his leadership and ability to run a team makes him extremely intriguing. There are not many players on any level with the vision and passing ability that he possesses. He also seems to have gained some speed and athleticism over the past 6 months, after coming back from a leg injury. Micic was a downhill skier as a youth and he attributes some of his vision, reflexes and quick decision making abilities to his years on the slopes. There are still some concerns with his foot speed and ability to score, but his heart for the game and determination are excellent. For those that enjoy imaginative passing, Micic is a true joy to watch. NBA Comparison: Jose Calderon
19.
uu
marshall Willie Cauley Stein 7-0 235 C Kentucky So. Cauley-Stein has become a force for Kentucky as a shot blocker in his sophomore season. He runs the floor like a deer and plays with tremendous energy. While his offensive game lacks touch and polish and he may never possess much of a post game, he's able to score using his athleticism with ally oops and put backs. Cauley-Stein projects as a mid first rounder who has a lot of potential due to his excellent athleticism. NBA Comparison: Dan Gadzuric
20.
u
marshall
Aaron Gordon 6-8 220 PF Arizona Fr. Gordon is an explosive leaper and a great kid. He will impress teams in interviews and has proven himself as a team leader winning MVP of the U19 Championships in Prague, where he put himself in a positive light with many NBA scouts. Many seem to love the Blake Griffin comparison, but it just isn't very accurate. He lacks the sheer power of a Griffin and doesn't appear to have the frame to carry that type of weight. He's determined to turn himself into a small forward, but that appears unlikely to happen. Let's turn down the hype machine on this kid just a tad and let him breathe before the backlash is too great. Gordon will be an excellent role player in the NBA someday.NBA Comparison: Kenneth Faried
21.
u
zeller
Kyle Anderson 6-9 230 SF/PG UCLA So. "Slow Mo" has shown excellent improvement between his freshman and sophomore seasons. For starters he has cut down on his turnovers and improved upon his A/TO ratio. He also looks much more comfortable creating offense for himself and others and his once inconsistent jumpshot has become much more reliable. He's even hitting 3 pointers at an excellent clip, though on a low volume. Scouts are still concerned about his lack of speed and quickness making him a difficult player to assess. But his skill level and length makes him an intriguing prospect. His rebounding ability garners scout's admiration, as does his ability to shoot over smaller defenders. He has even received some lottery chatter from scouts. NBA Comparison: Jalen Rose
22.
u
zeller
Dario Saric 6-10 225 PF/SF Split Croatia 1994 Saric has an old man's game as he has a high basketball IQ and beats opponents with brains over braun. His shot has long been an area of weakness but has shown recent improvement, in particular in the Eurobasket. He's got legitimate PG skills with the ability to see the floor and find teammates for shots, however his lack of foot speed might force him to play the 4, as opposed to being a full time 3. He lacks great athleticism and footspeed, and has a game that is probably best suited to being a star in Europe as opposed to an NBA role guy, however his determination and toughness will allow him to play in the NBA and be a contributor if he so desires. NBA Comparison: Dejan Bodiroga
23.
zeller
Adreian Payne 6-9 230 PF Michigan St. Sr. Payne came in as a highly decorated recruit and while he had his ups and downs, he stuck around though his senior season. And it should prove very beneficial as his game has really shown significant improvement in the past year. His jumpshot has become extremely accurate with excellent form and rotation. He could see his stock affected some by his play in March and how far the Spartans make it in the tournament. NBA Comparison: Robert Horry
24.
t
marshall
Montrezl Harrell 6-8 240 PF Louisville So. Harrell is an intriguing 4 man due to his great power and explosiveness. Despite being undersized at 6-8, he possesses a huge wingspan and plays with a high level of energy. Scouts who watched him play for team USA at the U19 Championships in Prague raved about him comparing him to Ben Wallace.With Russdiculous and Chris Jones in the backcourt, Harrell is forced to get most of his baskets off of rebounds, put backs or the occasional ally oop. But he's most valuable to the team providing the dirty work: rebounding and playing physical around the basket. NBA Comparison: JJ Hickson
25.
u
ross
[Player: Samaj Christon] 6-3 190 PG Xavier So. Christon has a tremendous basketball body with the speed and quickness to get to the basket as well as the length to give opposing point guards headaches as an on ball defender. The one major weakness that he must improve upon is his shot which comes off flat and lacks a fluid release. His development in this area will be crucial to his draft stock this season. Playing at Xavier has allowed Christon to fly under the radar without a great deal of attention, despite being one of the most prolific freshman scorers in the country last year. He's begun to put things together midway through his sophomore campaign. NBA Comparison: Keyon Dooling
26.
u
ross
Markel Brown 6-4 190 SG Oklahoma St. Sr. Brown is an undersized 2 guard but he has the requisite freakish athleticism to overcome the size disadvantage. His ability to create shots off the dribble are enhanced by his top flight speed and athleticism. He's long been one of the most explosive guards in the country, but he has added a consistent jumpshot and improved ball handling and decision making to his skill set. Playing alongside Marcus Smart for two seasons has certainly been beneficial to him. Despite being undersized, Brown is a solid bet to grab a late first round spot in a deep draft. NBA Comparison: Avery Bradley
27.
u
ross
Deonte Burton 6-1 185 PG Nevada Sr. Burton has been on the radar since his freshman season but leading up to his senior year he struggled with consistency and efficiency. He has matured, becoming a more judicious decision maker and showing the ability to run the team effectively, albeit a struggling team. Burton's speed and athleticism are top notch and he's had numerous highlight reel dunks a la Steve Francis throughout his college career. His blow by speed will be a big asset as an ISO guard at the next level and if he can truly develop into a game manager and floor general, he has starting NBA PG potential. NBA Comparison: Louis Williams
28.
u
rivers [Player: Olivier Hanlan] 6-3 190 PG Boston College So. Hanlan is a magician with the ball as he shows a Steph Curry like ability to rock defenders off balance and create shots with limited space. He not the talent or shooter of Curry, but he's a high level scorer in his own right that will benefit from the hand checking rules in the NBA. His point guard abilities remain a question mark and his development in this area is sure to impact just how high his stock can climb. He's a very crafty, cerebral player with great hand/eye coordination. He's already had a 38 point game and appears ready to build on a terrific freshman season. NBA Comparison: CJ McCollum
29.
u
rivers
Roscoe Smith 6-8 220 PF UNLV Jr. Roscoe Smith might be the best rebounder in college basketball. He's really built up his body and there aren't many players on the college level with his type of athleticism. After sitting out last season, he appears to have a lot of pent up aggression to unleash on opponents. His athleticism and rebounding far exceed his offensive ability, which consists mainly of put backs and garbage buckets. NBA Comparison: Hakim Warrick
30.
rivers
Shabazz Napier 6-1 181 PG UConn Sr. Has put it all together in his senior year and become both a team leader and a clutch go-to scorer. Napier received criticism for his lack of leadership and was even described as being selfish early in his college career. He has really evolved with four years of college and is praised for his leadership now in his senior year. Though he's not an explosive athlete, his talent has never been in question as he shows great quickness and belief in his abilities. He was a key reserve as a freshman to UConn's title team and if he can close out his final college year strong, he'll be in contention for a late first round selection. NBA Comparison: Tyronn Lue
"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast!" 🎸⚽🏀🎨
Master Yoda
Master Yoda
Dokazano ovisan
Pristupio: 12.10.2010.
Poruka: 16.074
19. siječnja 2014. u 13:15
vasilije micić ispred šarića a hezonje ni nema?????? ne znam kad sam vidio gluplju prognozu drafte od ove
Virujmo struci
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 29.10.2013.
Poruka: 684
19. siječnja 2014. u 13:19

Micic ispred Sarica, Hezonje i Bogdanovica. Svasta.

A sto se Hezonje tice, bilo je jos nekoliko lista ne kojima ga nisam vidio.

goikoetxea
goikoetxea
Mali dioničar
Pristupio: 02.10.2010.
Poruka: 7.976
19. siječnja 2014. u 13:22
hezonju racunaju za klasu 2015.


obzirom da minutaza u barceloni nije dovoljna za dizanje dionica i da nece odmah u nba, izaci na ovogodisnji draft zaista nema smisla. on ce na draft dogodine osim u slucaju da nadje nacin da se podigne u lutriju ( recimo nike hoops... )
...ladne su mi, ladne ove kiše a na jugu i zime su od zlata...
madmax17
madmax17
Većinski vlasnik Foruma
Pristupio: 28.04.2007.
Poruka: 28.249
19. siječnja 2014. u 13:23
Mir ljudi, Hezonju su prebacili na iduću godinu 
"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast!" 🎸⚽🏀🎨
Master Yoda
Master Yoda
Dokazano ovisan
Pristupio: 12.10.2010.
Poruka: 16.074
19. siječnja 2014. u 13:24
hezonja je tu još najmanji propust, ima ga na većini projekcija, ali vjerujem da on neće izać ove godine. ali vasilije micić da bude ispred šarića koji je stavljen tek na 22. mjesto. ja sam micića gledao dosta puta i on meni nije ni za prvu rundu drafta a ne za 18.pick
Virujmo struci
Murta
Murta
Potencijal za velika djela
Pristupio: 02.08.2009.
Poruka: 1.040
19. siječnja 2014. u 14:21
Ma da, NBADraft.net je katastrofa tijekom sezone, njih se jedino isplati čitati dva i manje tjedana prije drafta kad se malo skuliraju u procjenama i počnu pridruživati igrače klubovima. Čak je i Bleacher značajno realniji.

Osim Draftexpressa i Chada Forda, ja volim čitati Chrisa Mannixa sa SI.com. Jučer je objavio 3.0 big board mock, značajno bolji nego NBADraft.netov.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/nba/news/20140116/nba-big-board-jabari-parker-andrew-wiggins-joel-embiid/
madmax17
madmax17
Većinski vlasnik Foruma
Pristupio: 28.04.2007.
Poruka: 28.249
19. siječnja 2014. u 14:33
Vidim i zašto Šarić prije Smarta  ako se to stvarno desi svaka čast ali nekako sumnjam u to.
"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast!" 🎸⚽🏀🎨
  • Najnovije
  • Najčitanije