opet ti o muskim guzicama. drzi se teme, molio bih...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAOkw0hL_3w&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Pa ni ovo nije fairplay, al lep gol ;)

zasto je glup?....mog suigraca golmana su sa 8 (osam) godina ucili da neide postavljat zivi zid dok sudac ne pokaze na zvizdaljku, jer ce tek u tom slucaju sudac ici izmjeriti 9.15 metara i onda nek si ga postavi na milimetar...naravno mi djeca to nismo bas provodili jer izvodac koji je isto imo osam godina je jedva i dobacio do gola...al pusti sad to...bit je u tome da si jedan profesionalac nesmje dopustit takve stvari..zasto? pa ako su mene u kikicima to naucili ja sam siguran da su i njemu trebali rec, pa ako to ipak napravi ja cu onako seljacki na prvu zakljucit da je glup...i sad zato sto je taj golman radio djecacke pogreske ovaj gol se naziva ne fair playom...pa ja te sad pitam jel njemu messi trebo dobacit, e prijatelju, pa nisam trazio 9 metara, zasto postavljas zid, aj ljepo se namjesti pa da mogu pucat :)

hahah daj molim te , želiš reći da svaki golman prije nego ode do stative uzima dalekozor koji mu stoji pored bočice s vodom i gleda u suca je li ovaj pokazao na zviždaljku.to ide nekako ovako , sudac svira faul , igra je prekinuta , skupljaju se igrači u zid i otprilike stanu njih četvorica ispred lopte , golman kao i svaki put ode do stative , kaže ovom najvišem :malo lijevo , ne toliko! vrati se , dobro! i onda lagano se vrati na svoje mjesto , sudac da znak i slobodan udarac se može  izvesti.napominjem da se ovo događa u samo 98.674532% slučajeva pa se može smatrati za nepisano pravilo kao i izbacivanje lopte u aut dok je potvnički igrač ili suigrač ozljeđen kao i vraćanje iste onome kod koga je bila u posjedu(ova nesvakidašnja situacija se isto događa u otprilike 99. 486578% slučajeva)

da, stanu njih četvorica, ali barem 4 metra bliže nego šta bi trebali stat, onda sudac odmiri 9 metara i 15 centimetara, golman postavi živi zid, sudac da znak zviždaljkom i izvođač puca... ovdi nije bilo tog mjerenja jer su se svi igrači Atletica naivno makli dovoljno daleko, Messi nije tražio od suca da mu makne živi zid na propisanu udaljenost i moga je odma pucat... U pravu si, rijetko se događa, jer obično momčadi nisu naivne da se samoinicijativno maknu na dovoljnu udaljenost, nego počnu namištat živi zid na nekih 5 metara od izvođača ili jedan igrač dođe provjeriti "jel lopta okrugla" tako da ga sudac vrati natrag na propisanu udaljenost...

Još vi o tome. Pa spornija su bila ona zaleđa Atleticu i krvnički start Fabregasa. Bolje se okrenimo ka idućim utakmicama. Inače, ima li nade da će Afellay igrat do kraja sezone?

Prljavi igraju prljavo 


"Update, 19:58 CET: While we didn't know this originally, HGH is banned under FIFA law, as per this document: "On the 2006 FIFA list of prohibited substances, HGH belongs to category S2, 'hormone and related substances.'"
***
Sky Sports' Barcelona-based writer Graham Hunter appeared on Irish radio show Off the Ball recently, and casually mentioned that Barcelona's (and Spain's--this will be important) star midfielder Xavi has used HGH (Human Growth Hormone) to deal with a calf strain. Hunter nonchalantly mentions Xavi's HGH use, then went on to explain that "was how they were treating him, very openly and publicly. [HGH] is an injection that Barcelona has been using to deal with muscle fatigue and muscle strains in their players over the past couple of years. They use it as a treatment."

Human Growth Hormone is banned in most major sports, certainly in all the major American leagues (MLB, NFL, NBA) and cycling. It's a synthetic version of the naturally occurring hormone that helps spur muscle and bone growth. In this case, Barcelona are using HGH to spur muscle regrowth and repair.

If this is true (we are inclined to believe Hunter, as he's a respected, famous journalist and has been very pro-Barcelona in the past), then there could be something really, deeply wrong with the sport generally. If doping allegations are treated so trivially, then there is really little hope of ever confronting doping on an international stage in soccer."


DEMANTI AUTORA:

Yesterday evening, we posted a piece where we reported that Mr. Graham Hunter, a journalist with Sky Sports--among other things--casually mentioned that Barcelona, and Xavi in particular had used "growth hormone" to treat a chronic achilles injury. In this case, the devil is in the details: while Mr. Hunter did say "growth hormone," this was actually a misnomer and a mistake on his part; we took that statement and ran with it, which was inappropriate and unprofessional.

We made two mistakes: first of all, we did not contact Mr. Hunter for further comment (we should have, given the nature of the accusation), and secondly, we made a jump from "growth hormone" to "HGH," because we assumed that an injection of "growth hormone" meant an injection of "HGH". Both mistakes fueled about two hours of intense scrutiny here and on Twitter, and we're very sorry for any misunderstandings our post may have caused.

We regret that we did not contact Mr. Hunter, and we wish him all the best, as he is a truly wonderful journalist. He was kind enough to send me information on the actual procedure that Xavi had undergone, which was an injection of blood plasma rich in Growth Factors (GF). This is legal, and is widely practiced. Here are some links to stories about plasma injections and GF, including a link to an article by the Center for Integrated Medecine describing some of the benefits of High Density Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections.

This misunderstanding stemmed from a lack of care on my part. I want to personally apologize for not taking the time to check all the facets of such a complicated story before publishing it. I regret any harm my actions caused to Mr. Hunter, and to the community at large. I strive to bring only slightly biased reporting on Real Madrid activity to this site, and my lack of professionalism in dealing with such a situation is unforgivable. I will do better in the future.

da ne bi ovo ostalo "visit u zraku".

gdje ima dima...