ivor je napisao/la:
i opet će se ovi pametnjakovići iz fife izvlačit na onu da je super da se o ovim greškama sada raspravlja i da je sve to dio igre i čar nogometa...
kakva je čar kad si žrtva sudačkog previda? stvarno ne vidim kako itko razuman može odbijat uvođenje tehnologije bar za pregledavanje jel bio ofsajd ili ne i je li lopta prošla gol-crtu...
dva challengea sa svake strane, odrediš što se može a što ne pregledavat, odnese koju minutu vremena al kao da vrijeme ne odnese i prosvjedovanje oštećene ekipe...
Vidi cijeli citat
Fifa decided to rule out the use of technology at a meeting of the
International Football Association Board in March. The IFAB board,
made up
of the four Home Nations and four Fifa officials including Blatter and
Valcke, voted 6-2 to oppose its introduction, with the Irish and Welsh
FA’s
voting with Fifa.
The then FA chief executive Ian Watmore and his Scottish FA counterpart
had
favoured the use of technology.
Jonathan Ford, chief executive of the Football Association of Wales,
said at
the time: "I was worried that you would end up with a stop-start
situation where you review all decisions and I don't see that as part
of the
game." 
Patrick Nelson, chief executive of the Irish FA, said: "We very much
appreciate the human side of the game, the debate, the controversy,
that's
why the board has taken this decision," he said.
(nabijem vam irsku mamicu, evo vam rasprave)
Blatter’s intransigent attitude stems from his belief that using
goal-line
technology would remove the “human element” from the game.
He has also said it would impact on its “universality”, believing that
the
game should be the same wherever it is played. He also has objections
to the
cost of the technology, which he has said could be prohibitive.
In an article published a week after the IFAB decision Blatter wrote:
“No
matter which technology is applied, at the end of the day a decision
will
have to be taken by a human being. This being the case, why remove the
responsibility from the referee to give it to someone else?

“It is often the case that, even after a slow-motion replay, ten
different
experts will have ten different opinions on what the decision should
have
been. Fans love to debate any given incident in a game. It is part of
the
human nature of our sport.”

Fifa’s goal is to improve the quality of refereeing, making referees
more
professional and better prepared, and to assist referees as much as
possible.
This is also the reason why refereeing experiments (such as with
additional
referees or the role of the fourth official) will continue to be
analysed,
to see how referees can be supported.” (mrš u tri ljepe sa dodatnim čoravcima
)
.
.
uglavnom seru gluposti, samo Škoti su za tehnologiju.