madmax17 je napisao/la:
...
He has also said it would impact on its “universality”, believing that
the
game should be the same wherever it is played. He also has objections
to the
cost of the technology, which he has said could be prohibitive.
In an article published a week after the IFAB decision Blatter wrote:
“No
matter which technology is applied, at the end of the day a decision
will
have to be taken by a human being. This being the case, why remove the
responsibility from the referee to give it to someone else?

“It is often the case that, even after a slow-motion replay, ten
different
experts will have ten different opinions on what the decision should
have
been. Fans love to debate any given incident in a game. It is part of
the
human nature of our sport.”

Fifa’s goal is to improve the quality of refereeing, making referees
more
professional and better prepared, and to assist referees as much as
possible.
This is also the reason why refereeing experiments (such as with
additional
referees or the role of the fourth official) will continue to be
analysed,
to see how referees can be supported.” (mrš u tri ljepe sa dodatnim čoravcima
)
Au, jebateled, pa nisam znao da se rasprave na vrhu fife vode na tako visokoj filozofskoj razini. Jer već je i rasprava o samoj ljudskoj naravi vječna filozofska tema, a kamoli rasprava o ljudskoj naravi sporta! Čudi me samo da nisu uključili i teologe...
Uh.... Evo, mogao bi autor ovog teksta:
[uredio Brane - 27. lipnja 2010. u 21:29]