Saintsi su svojom nesposobnošću dopustili jednom od najvažnijih igrača napada da ode u divizijske rivale... bravo, samo tako naprijed...

Lionsi dogovorili produljenje na 7 godina sa Calvin Johnsonom. 7 godina, 132 milijuna, 60 garantirano.

s njim je sve MEGA.

prešo i preko fitza, mogo je malo manju lovu uzet, ali ovo je oke, ako oni nesretnici colston i mičem mogu uzet po 50 što ne bi ovaj 130..jebote kolko kurvi i droge bih si uzeo s ovom lovom

a sto im ga tehnicki znaci ovo 60 garantirano? mislim znam da je to osnovna placa(i eventualni bonus za potpis) a ovo do 130 su valjda neki performance bonusi i slicno...

ali da li to znaci ako sad uzme kurve i drogu pa ga se pozele rijesit, da mu tih 60 moraju isplatit bez obzira na sve?

tamo kod njih na forumu pišu da je manje od 60, ali koliko se ja kužim u to, to je to - da, 60 mu moraju isplatit, ovo će ovisiti o broju utakmica,produkciji itd... ti ugovori su dosta zajebani u nflu, ono ga više manje nakon svake sezone mogu cut-at kao manninga ove, a tek mu je 2 godina novog ugovora

aha moguce, pa logicno da imaju neko osiguranje za te pare, inace bi se svak odma bacio na kurve i drogu 

Kako je ovo 10 godina staro i bio je novi CBA u međuvremenu možda su se neke stvari promijenile ali generalno bit bi trebala biti vise manje isto

http://www.howstuffworks.com/question644.htm

Say, for example, a player wants a seven-year, $60-million contract. Let's say that the owner decides to give that player an $11-million signing bonus, which is all paid out in the first year but gets factored into the cap as prorated over the course of the seven-year contract ($11-million / 7 years = $1.57-million per year). Most NFL contracts are "back-ended" -- most of the base salary is located in the last two or three years of the contract. If we suppose that our player's contract is structured so that he has a base salary of $2-million the first year, with higher base salaries in the final two years of the contract, the $13-million (base salary + signing bonus) paid out in the first year appears as $3.57-million to the cap! The advantage of signing bonuses for the owner is that he now has more money to spend under the cap. This is how the Washington Redskins ran up a total payroll of $92.41-million in the 2000 season when the cap was $67-million. The advantage for the player is that all signing-bonus money is guaranteed to be paid, whereas an NFL contract is not guaranteed.

There are drawbacks to signing bonuses for the owner, however. Because the bonus is guaranteed to the player, if the player is released, traded or waived, all of the bonus money that was being prorated throughout the length of the contract is accelerated to the present year. So, if our team released its star player after the third year of his contract (before June 1) for whatever reason, the entire remainder of the bonus, almost $6.3-million, will have to count toward the cap the next year (if the team releases the player after June 1, only the yearly $1.57-million will count the next year, and the remainder will count the subsequent year).


edit: http://www.askthecommish.com/salarycap/faq.asp
evo jedan link sa novijim pravilima uzetima u obzir koji objasnjava malo vise detalja