NFL 2010

aristotel
aristotel
Potencijal za velika djela
Pristupio: 11.11.2009.
Poruka: 1.371
04. siječnja 2011. u 22:41
evo da se i ja priključim..

NO @ SEA -> NO
GB @ PHI  -> GB
BAL @ KC -> KC
NYJ @ IND -> IND

GB @ ATL -> GB
NO @ CHI -> CHI
KC @ PIT  -> PIT
IND @ NE -> NE

GB @ CHI -> GB
PIT @ NE -> NE

NE - GB -> GB nakon produžetaka

(možda sam malo subjektivan ali zar nisu svi navijači takvi ; ali sad zaozbiljno- packersima će bi najteža utakmica protiv eaglesa pošto su se potrošili i fizički i mentalno u ove 2 zadnje utakmice i ako to dobiju 99% dobijaju Atlantu a dalje je sve otvoreno ali vjerovatnost da odu do kraja nije baš velika jer teško je igrati sve utakmice u gostima; i uvjeren sam da će Bearsi izbacit Saintse /ne bih volio ali imam osjećaj/)
Bol nestane. Komadi vole ožiljke. Slava- traje vječno!!
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 20.02.2006.
Poruka: 35.530
04. siječnja 2011. u 22:51
zaozbiljno dobit atlantu u gostima nije nikome bas lagan posao...
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 12.03.2009.
Poruka: 17.274
04. siječnja 2011. u 23:29
Kauboj je napisao/la:
1,3 na Patriote... pa to je mali koeficijent kad igraju jednu utakmicu u kojoj su favoriti, a kamoli za cijeli playoff!  Znaci ovo ne treba ni igrat...
Vidi cijeli citat


jel ima kontra, realno ako ima koef bi trebao bit oko 2.70, ja bi to odma uplatio sa 100tkom
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 15.01.2010.
Poruka: 1.332
05. siječnja 2011. u 02:55

Ja ne pratim toliko koliko vi, ali nije li da su Eaglesi dosta loše odigrali zadnje 3 tekme, ono izvlačenje pobjede nad Giantsima kakvo im neće uspjeti slijedećih 30 godina, nakon toga 2 poraza u predzadnjem i zadnjem kolu. Malo hladni ulaze u doigravanje.

Ja nizakoga posebno ne navijam samo se nadam da Coltsi neće daleko dogurati. Ajmo reći da bih volio da Baltimore nešto napravi, iako prema viđenom i vašim komentarima neće super bowl vidjeti. 

prekro
prekro
Mali dioničar
Pristupio: 14.01.2010.
Poruka: 5.575
05. siječnja 2011. u 10:55
Multiforma je napisao/la:

Ja ne pratim toliko koliko vi, ali nije li da su Eaglesi dosta loše odigrali zadnje 3 tekme, ono izvlačenje pobjede nad Giantsima kakvo im neće uspjeti slijedećih 30 godina, nakon toga 2 poraza u predzadnjem i zadnjem kolu. Malo hladni ulaze u doigravanje.

Ja nizakoga posebno ne navijam samo se nadam da Coltsi neće daleko dogurati. Ajmo reći da bih volio da Baltimore nešto napravi, iako prema viđenom i vašim komentarima neće super bowl vidjeti. 

Vidi cijeli citat


je, Eaglesi su odigrali 1 dobru četvrtinu od zadnjih 12!

kaj imaš protiv Coltsa? ja se baš nadam da će doći daleko, iako sumnjam u takav rasplet...

ali očekujem da Baltimore odigra puno bolje! čak mislim da bi mogli dobit Patriotse (prije će ih oni dobit nego Picburg)...kao što veli Marušić, Patsi su predobri da bi to bilo istinito...jednostavno im se sve poklapalo, i lako se može desit (pogotovo jer su mlada momčad) da izgore u nekoj tekmi!

uglavnom, ja sam u svojoj prognozi gurnuo Ravense do kraja, iako mi nikad nisu bili nešto posebno simpatični...
aristotel
aristotel
Potencijal za velika djela
Pristupio: 11.11.2009.
Poruka: 1.371
05. siječnja 2011. u 14:16
Marko Marušić je napisao/la:
zaozbiljno dobit atlantu u gostima nije nikome bas lagan posao...
Vidi cijeli citat

ma nisam ni rekao da će bit lako.. ali gledao sam nedavno njihovu tekmu u regularnom dijelu.. atlanta je dobila field goalom sa istekom vremena, uz nekoliko nesvakidašnjih događaja (rodgers fumbla na 1 y, na 4th & 2 suci priznaju atlanti hvatanje iako nisu trebali).. packersi su dopustili turneru previše yardi probijanjem i tu su spušili, ali gledao sam ih ove godine dosta puta i dobro uče na vlastitim greškama.. uz to, mislim da GB ima iskusniju ekipu u doigravanju.. ukratko, odatle moj optimizam..

ali, kao što rekoh bit će zajebano protiv eaglesa, pa nema razloga trčat pred rudo..
[uredio aristotel - 05. siječnja 2011. u 14:18]
Bol nestane. Komadi vole ožiljke. Slava- traje vječno!!
danchy
danchy
Većinski vlasnik Foruma
Pristupio: 23.07.2009.
Poruka: 35.811
05. siječnja 2011. u 20:55
Nakon što mi je komp proradio nakon tjedan dana, evo i moje prognoze:
NO @ SEA = NO
GB @ PHI  = PHI
BAL @ KC = BAL
NYJ @ IND = IND
----------------------
NO @ ATL = NO
PHI @ CHI = PHI
BAL @ NE = NE
IND @ PIT = PIT
--------------------
NO @ PHI = NO
PIT @ NE = NE
-------------------
NO vs NE = NE

Nadam se da neće ovako završit i da Patsi neće do kraja, al izgledaju jako dobro i jedini nedostatak im je neiskustvo i dosta mladih igrača, ali to može u pojedinim trenucima naravno biti i prednost. Navijački bi mi finale bilo Bal- Phi, ali to je teško za očekivat, pa se nadam da će bar jedni vidjet SB
[uredio danchy - 05. siječnja 2011. u 21:37]
Marva je marva, u trnju jede, u blatu spava, ali se nikada ne uprlja k'o čovjek!
danchy
danchy
Većinski vlasnik Foruma
Pristupio: 23.07.2009.
Poruka: 35.811
05. siječnja 2011. u 21:34
prekro je napisao/la:
Multiforma je napisao/la:

Ja ne pratim toliko koliko vi, ali nije li da su Eaglesi dosta loše odigrali zadnje 3 tekme, ono izvlačenje pobjede nad Giantsima kakvo im neće uspjeti slijedećih 30 godina, nakon toga 2 poraza u predzadnjem i zadnjem kolu. Malo hladni ulaze u doigravanje.

Ja nizakoga posebno ne navijam samo se nadam da Coltsi neće daleko dogurati. Ajmo reći da bih volio da Baltimore nešto napravi, iako prema viđenom i vašim komentarima neće super bowl vidjeti. 

Vidi cijeli citat


je, Eaglesi su odigrali 1 dobru četvrtinu od zadnjih 12!

kaj imaš protiv Coltsa? ja se baš nadam da će doći daleko, iako sumnjam u takav rasplet...

ali očekujem da Baltimore odigra puno bolje! čak mislim da bi mogli dobit Patriotse (prije će ih oni dobit nego Picburg)...kao što veli Marušić, Patsi su predobri da bi to bilo istinito...jednostavno im se sve poklapalo, i lako se može desit (pogotovo jer su mlada momčad) da izgore u nekoj tekmi!

uglavnom, ja sam u svojoj prognozi gurnuo Ravense do kraja, iako mi nikad nisu bili nešto posebno simpatični...
Vidi cijeli citat

ne loše, već očajno... kao navijaču Eaglesa to mi se nimalo ne sviđa, ali ipak nadam se da će neiskustvo Rodgersa u playoffu pomoći Eaglesima da uzmu pobjedu i revanširaju se Bearsima za glup poraz u regularnoj sezoni. Vick, Jackson, Samuel će bit spremni, drugim riječima svi najvažniji igrači i nadam se pobjedi...
ako Eaglesi ispadnu nadam se će Packersi ili Saintsi otići do kraja, svakako ću za njih navijat zbog simpatija prema QB, ali i čitavoj organizaciji...
Vjeruje li uopće netko da će Seahawksi dobit? Vidim na pickemu samo 4 %, malo premalo za playoff
Marva je marva, u trnju jede, u blatu spava, ali se nikada ne uprlja k'o čovjek!
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 23.07.2009.
Poruka: 10.259
05. siječnja 2011. u 21:47
ma lose igraju,ali mihajlo je iskusan u playoffu i siguran sam da ce se potrgat i da ce proc iako mi je GB dost drag
Konfuzije
Konfuzije
Većinski vlasnik Foruma
Pristupio: 20.11.2004.
Poruka: 24.334
05. siječnja 2011. u 23:19
Odličan tekst, u inat svima koji pljuju Seahawkse i govore kako ne zaslužuju mjesto u playoffu

Beware the sub-.500 Seahawks

Schoenfield By David Schoenfield
Page 2
Archive

Dear Haters,

Bring it on. Mock the Seahawks. Call them the worst playoff team ever. Whine and sob about the injustice of it all, how your imagined sense of fairness has been destroyed by a 7-9 team soiling the NFL playoffs with its blue stink. Point out all the statistics your little minds can hold before exploding from information overload -- point differential, DVOA, average yards per rush, Matt Hasselbeck's QB rating, Pete Carroll's ratio of funny-to-weird tweets, whatever.

Heck, make fun of the uniforms if you want.

Guess what? We don't care. The stadium will be sold out for Saturday's game against the Saints, with Seahawks fans going crazy waving their lime green towels. It will be louder than an Iron Maiden concert from 1985. And just to rub it in everyone's faces, we hope it rains so hard that Drew Brees will think the footballs were soaked in Puget Sound.

Let me put it another way: We laugh at your criticism. Consider that for the better part of three decades, our professional sports teams have choked, gagged, disappointed, crushed our hearts, underperformed, stunk, been screwed by the refs and then by a no-good slickster from Oklahoma who stole our beloved basketball franchise. So, no, your indignation does not bother us; the way we look at is that we're four wins away from a Super Bowl celebration.

Please, enough moaning about the sanctity of the regular season. Every team worth my three hours of tube time is in the playoffs. The Giants? Try covering a punt return properly and we'll listen to your complaints. The Bucs? Four wins against the NFC West, two wins over Carolina, wins over Cleveland, Cincinnati, Washington and New Orleans ... in other words, their only win against a good team came in the season finale when the Saints didn't care.

Look, if you want fairness, just put the two best teams in the Super Bowl. But that's not the way the playoffs work: Under the current playoff structure, only 20 of 40 No. 1 seeds have reached the Super Bowl. Take your gripes to Katherine Harris and see if she'll do anything about them.

Here's another thing: Why not rally around the Seahawks? Isn't this the type of storyline we're supposed to embrace, the underdog overcoming incalculable odds to shock the world (not to mention the pundits)? In an NFL season in which the major plot lines were Brett Favre's return, Brett Favre's private parts, Michael Vick, the NFL's investigation of Brett Favre, concussions, Brett Favre's injuries, Rex Ryan's wife's toes, Brett Favre's fine and Brett Favre's impending retirement, here's an actual feel-good story without revolting undertones. It's a lot more interesting than rooting for yet more success from Tom Brady or Peyton Manning, that's for sure (not to mention the twin pariahs of shame, Vick and Ben Roethlisberger).

Trust me on this: Seattle fans have suffered much more than Cleveland fans. Cleveland's teams have mostly been crappy and irrelevant. None of them actually should have won a championship, except maybe the 1995 Indians. Meanwhile, Seattle has had many great teams that didn't win.

In short order, the Sonics dominated throughout the '90s, only to suffer inglorious defeat after inglorious defeat in the playoffs. In 1993, we lost Game 7 of the conference finals to the Phoenix Suns when the refs committed crimes against humanity by allowing the Suns to shoot 64 free throws. The next year, Seattle had the best record in the post-Jordan NBA, but Dikembe Mutombo and the eighth-seeded Nuggets pulled off the biggest playoff upset in NBA history. A couple of years after that, we had the best team in Sonics history, only to run into the 72-10 Bulls in the NBA Finals. Even took two games in the series, not that anyone remembers.

The Seahawks went 13-3 in 2005 and reached the Super Bowl. We outgained the Steelers and committed fewer turnovers, but referee Bill Leavy took us behind the woodshed and performed unmentionable acts.

The Mariners had Griffey, A-Rod, Randy Johnson, Edgar Martinez and Jay Buhner and couldn't reach the World Series. We lost to the Yankees in the 2000 ALCS in part because Jamie Moyer broke his kneecap when he was hit by a line drive during a simulated game following the ALDS (damn you, Chris Widger!). By 2001, the Mariners had lost A-Rod, Griffey and Randy Johnson ... and won an all-time record 116 games. Only to lose again to the Yankees in the ALCS.

Sorry, Cleveland, but those Bernie Kosar Browns teams would have been destroyed in the Super Bowl anyway. Plus, you eventually got your football team back. Where's our NBA franchise?

Let me ask you this:

Were the Giants better than the Patriots?

Was Villanova better than Georgetown?

The Houston Rockets made the NBA Finals in 1981 with a losing record.

The Arizona Cardinals nearly won the Super Bowl a couple of years ago with a lousy 9-7 record.

The Yankees won the World Series in 2000 despite having only the fifth-best record in the American League. The 2006 Cardinals won the World Series despite a meager 83-78 regular season.

But I understand. Everyone loves to drink the Haterade these days. Go ahead, assume the Saints will win by 30 points. However, let me leave you with one final statistic: Matt Hasselbeck threw for 366 yards earlier this season against the Saints.

In the NFL, there are no guarantees. Four wins away. It would be one heck of a story.

David Schoenfield is a senior editor for ESPN.com.


227398
  • Najnovije
  • Najčitanije