panterhsi su izgubili i petu utakmicu nakon sto su vodili u 4th q. bice ludo u ovoj konferenciji za wild card. Cetiri tima sa 6:6 a evo s kim igraju do kraja(utakmice kuci bold):
Giants: Panthers, Eagles, Saints, Redskins
Panthers: Giants, Steelers, Falcons, Saints
Eagles: Redskins, Giants, Cowboys, Falcons
Falcons: Tampa, Cowboys, Panthers, Eagles
Zanimljivo je tie-breaker, prvo se gleda head to head a zatim division %, posliije toga conference %...
evo kako radi tie-breaker
Tiebreaking tutorial
The Bears, Cowboys, and Rams all have 10-6 records, and none is their division champion. Since there are two available wildcard spots, we apply these rules. Suppose the Bears beat the Cowboys, the Cowboys beat the Rams, and the Rams beat the Bears. The first criterion cannot apply (since there is no clearcut head-to-head winner). Since this is a wild-card tiebreaker (and not all the teams are from the same division), we skip criterion 2. Let's say they all had identical 8-4 records in the NFC, so criterion 3 is not sufficient. Finally, we see that the Bears had a 3-1 record versus common opponents (criterion 4), while the Rams had a 2-2 record, and the Cowboys a 1-3 record. This would cause the Bears and Cowboys to advance, since:
- The Bears qualified on the common-opponents rule
- The Cowboys and Rams tie is broken separately, so we return to the head-to-head rule, meaning the Cowboys advance. The fact that the Rams had a better record against common opponents is irrelevant because this is a lower criterion.
“Kam hit this tight end SO HARD, I swear I saw that TE’s soul leave Qwest Field right on that 35 yard line.”