X: Yeah, they schooled them.

P-Mac: (Laughing) They beat them 2-and-1. You know we were up set point to go up two-sets-to-love in the doubles (against Croatia), and all of a sudden...you know its funny how a couple of points here or there can turn the whole thing. It''s disappointing, I''d be lying if I didn''t say I was extremely disappointed because I thought we had a very good chance to win it all this year. That''s why you have to play the matches.

X: Whenever you lose you kind of look back and point to things...

P-Mac: Part of me wishes we had that kind of (Tennis-X) analysis done by the regular press -- that would make tennis more interesting and better served. It''s probably something that if we played another match with the same team, obviously for Andre we''d make the court slightly quicker. When you''re playing Ljubicic and Ancic, and Ljubicic is playing pretty damn good tennis -- I thought that was the right way to go. It''s not a decision I take lightly, or I don''t put a lot of thought into. You know we played a very good team. So I can beat myself up all I want, and certainly I have, but I just want people to understand that there''s a lot of thought that goes into exactly how the surface is going to be. It didn''t work this time, but it may not have been -- but you saw what happened when the Bryans played Ancic and Ljubicic on clay (at Monte Carlo approximately a month later where the Bryans won 6-2, 6-1).

X: When you guys were practicing during the lead-up week, was it "This looks good," or "Uh oh, this looks like it might be a little slow..."

P-Mac: I think we all knew that Andre was struggling a little bit with getting used to it. I mean Andy was absolutely fine, and the Bryans -- I mean I speak to all the guys about the surface, I don''t go out there and make the call about the surface without talking to the players. But at the end of the day I have to be responsible for the final decision, which I am. I thought it was slow, but that was the plan, to have it slow. I think Andre had trouble adjusting to it early, but it wasn''t something where I was saying ''Hey, we''re in trouble here, I''d better change the court'' -- no.

Od ovih današnjih argentinaca najbliži malom zelenom su Aimar i D Alessandro, vrhunski playmakeri, znalci, ali ipak jedan je jedini Diego. Tevez je dobar, al on je čista špica, Mascherano je zadnji vezni, dok Riquelme nije klasa ovih igrača, dobar u manjim klubovima, u Barci nije mogo igrat.

Pa fino do sad sam sve zdrmal,očito se preveč kužim u NBA,pa mi se neda tu pisati
Phoenix je prošle,fulal sam samo rezultat
San Antonio vodi 3:1 i igra doma znači najvjeroatnije pogodak i to u rzultatu
Seaatle,sam bil najbliži fulala rezultat
Dallas igra sutra u Houstonu i tam domeći pobjedi,i zadnja kod telci i to bum pogodil
Miami pogođeno baš sve
Detroit također
Indiana vodi 3:2 i igra doma,znači moguće i jedno i drugo
e sad Chicago igra trenutno mi se čini 2:2,danas doma zgubi,onda u Washingtonu pobjedi i opet zgubi doma i eto 3:4
.-D.-D

Super topic

Ovo mi je bio najlijepsi dan zivota!

evo jene pijesme, da za pijevamo svi skupa:

Mene moja naucila mati, mene moja naucila mati
da ja pijevam zivjeli Hrvati, da ja pijevam zivijeli hrvati
jedan dva, op sa sa

Mene moja naucila strina, mene moja naucila strina
svim srbima ................, svim srbima........................
jedan dva, evo vam ga na!

(ajd Gorstak, sr-bistabil i.t.d, pogonite ako ste tak pametni kako mi se cinite

Mi Hrvati, neka uvijek budemo braca!!!!!!!

Po meni je ova tekma velika nepoznanica pobjednika.
S jedne strane Chelsea fantastični pojedinci još bolja momčad.Ali bez Irca D. Duff-a mi izgleda dosta slabija i "sivlja" momčad.On mi je upo u oko svojom brzinom (brzim i nekako lakim trkom),Ima odličan pregled i još bolji pos.Jednostavno FANTASTIČAN.

S druge strane domaćin (po meni možda teže breme zbog tog gola u gostima,tak da i ti uistinu Fantastični navijači sa Anfielda u ovom slučaju i nije neka ogromna prednost.).
A Liverpool je žedan Europskih pokala.Imaju momčad koja je u usponu ,Sada ih čak mogu vidit i kao nove vlasnike Europskog Trona.

Očekujem lijepu tekmu. 50-50

dakle da potvrdim da je DINAMO u sezoni 98-9 bio DRUGI u grupi:

http://www.uefa.com/competitions/UCL/AllTimeStatistics/Season=1998/round=1211/Group=971.html

ili ako se nekom ne da copy paste sa iste stranice:

Group A

Clubs Pld W D L GF GA Pts

Olympiacos 6 3 2 1 8 6 11
Dinamo Zagreb 6 2 2 2 5 7 8
Porto 6 2 1 3 11 9 7
Ajax 6 2 1 3 4 6 7


Pld: Matches played W: Won Drawn
L: Lost GF: Goals for GA: Goals against
Pts: Points


Matches
Porto 2 - 2 Olympiacos
Dinamo Zagreb 0 - 0 Ajax
Ajax 2 - 1 Porto
Olympiacos 2 - 0 Dinamo Zagreb
Porto 3 - 0 Dinamo Zagreb
Olympiacos 1 - 0 Ajax
Ajax 2 - 0 Olympiacos
Dinamo Zagreb 3 - 1 Porto
Ajax 0 - 1 Dinamo Zagreb
Olympiacos 2 - 1 Porto
Porto 3 - 0 Ajax
Dinamo Zagreb 1 - 1 Olympiacos