kad već spominjete Speer-a
vidio sam ga u dosta dokumentaraca i bio je u dosta nacističkih filmova...(ja ga najviše pamtim iz ovog filma
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082114/ )
nasao sam nekakvu mini seriju iz 1982 koja je snimljena prema njegovim memoarima i knjizi ''
Inside the Third Reich''
http://www.demonoid.me/files/details/2552124/008522825736/
a što se tiče pokajanja i toga da on nije znao za to...tako je izjavljeno na suđenju u Nürnbergu...ali kasnije se po njegovim interviewima i knjigama dolazilo do drguačijih činjenica....
evo nekakav mali text o toj kontroverzi
In the book, as at the Nuremberg Trials, Speer denied any knowledge of the Holocaust. While he does admit to his knowledge of slave labor
used in his ministry, Speer claimed that he tried to improve the slave
laborers' condition, and that he preferred not to use such labor.
Even his editorial aide, Joachim Fest, noted in later editions of Inside the Third Reich
that much of what Speer wrote disagreed with his testimony at
Nuremberg. Most notably, Speer originally made up excuses as to why he
stayed with Hitler until the end, but in his memoirs, admitted he did so
out of personal loyalty.
In the book, Speer claimed to have contemplated Hitler's assassination in early 1945 to end the war. However, aside from an affidavit from one of his friends, Dieter Stahl, there is no evidence to substantiate this.
Moreover, Speer consented to numerous interviews after his release
from prison, and some of the things said in these interviews, like those
with Gitta Sereny, contradicted with both his court testimony and memoirs.
Supporters of Speer, such as Fest, claim Speer felt personal guilt
about the Nazi genocide, and that he spent his remaining years trying to
justify both to himself and the public why he had let himself be
deceived. Before his death, Speer compared his work on behalf of the
Nazis to that of a man who made a deal with the Devil.
Speer's detractors argue that his omissions and denials were based on his efforts to avoid execution
at Nuremberg. Many accounts of the trial depict Speer as a crafty and
intelligent defendant who pulled any string he could in his defense.
Moreover, other Nuremberg defendants in positions similar to Speer's
were hanged, most notably Fritz Sauckel,
who actually worked under Speer's orders. His claim to have tried to
kill Hitler is usually cited as one of the main reasons he was spared
the noose.
While arguments over Speer's guilt are ongoing, Inside the Third Reich
is used by historians on all sides as a primary source on the inner
workings of the Nazis. Speer's supporters have sardonically noted that
even historians who claim Speer is untrustworthy nonetheless incorporate
the memoirs into their work.