Crna Gora

Kauboj
Kauboj
Većinski vlasnik Foruma
Pristupio: 30.12.2003.
Poruka: 22.210
27. listopada 2006. u 20:27
džon vejn je napisao/la:
 evo, samo da ispravim tradicionalno širokopojasnog znalca.....petar svačić nije bio kralj, tj, smatra se da je legenda priča da je on bio kralj.....posljednji hrvatski kralj je bio  tomislav II....vladao je od 1941.-1945......vojvoda od oeste, namješten od fašističke vlade u rimu.....
Vidi cijeli citat


A dobro, možda se povijest promijenila u zadnjih 16-17 godina otkad sam ja to zadnji put učio.  Mene su učili otprilike ovako (bit će da sam ipak pobrkao godine njegove smrti):

Petar Svačić

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Death of the Last Croatian King, by Oton Ivekovic
Enlarge
Death of the Last Croatian King, by Oton Ivekovic

Petar Svačić (died in 1097), was the last native king of Croatia (reigned 1093–1097).

[edit] Biography

He assumed the throne amid deep tension throughout the Kingdom. His predecessor, Stjepan II (10891091) died without leaving an heir, sparking a major political crisis. The crisis was compounded when it was revealed that Jelena, the widow of King Zvonimir (10741089), was plotting the annexation of Croatia by her brother, King Laszlo I of Hungary. The opportunistic Laszlo used his sister's marriage to Zvonimir as justification for his inheritance of the Croatian Crown.

Meanwhile, Croatia's leading dignitaries and clergy elected nobleman Petar Svacic as King, who immediately deployed the military to defend Croatia's borders from Hungarian attack. However it was too little, too late. Laszlo, who had probably devised a military strategy two years earlier, launched an offensive and managed to breach Croatian lines along the Drava River. The well-prepared Hungarians soon occupied the entire province of Slavonia but were halted by the Croats at Mount Gvozd (nears today's Karlovac).

Shortly after his army's success, Laszlo died (1095), leaving his younger brother Kalman to continue the campaign. Svacic's troops maintained their resistance repelling Hungarian assaults for nearly two years. Kalman grew frustrated at his army's impotence and in 1097 assembled an enormous force at the eastern foot of Mount Gvozd. The subsequent offensive was brutal and absolute, resulting in Petar Svacic's death. His heroism was commemorated in the renaming of Mount Gvozd to Petrova Gora (Peter's Mountain).

Five years of negotiations between Croatia's remaining noblemen and Kalman followed thereafter. Finally, in 1102, an historic settlement was reached (Pacta Conventa) by which the Croats agreed to recognise Kalman as King. In return, he promised to maintain Croatia as a separate kingdom, not to settle Croatia with Hungarians, to guarantee Croatia's self-governance under a ban (governor), and to respect all the rights, laws and privileges of the Croatian Kingdom.

He was elected king by Croatian feudal lords in 1093. Petar's seat of power was based in Knin. His rule was marked by a struggle for control of the country with Hungary. During his reign he was able to expel Prince Álmos from Slavonia, and unite Croatia to the river Drava.

His good fortunes turned when Hungarian King Ladislaus died and was succeeded by Coloman in 1095. Coloman soon sought the blessing of Pope Urban II, and led an army into Croatia in 1097. At the battle of Gvozd Mountain, Petar's army was defeated by Coloman. Petar himself fell in battle, leading to the mountain being called Petrova Gora (Petar's Mountain).

Although traditionally attributed the surname of Svačić, it was likely simply a mis-reading of his actual surname, Snačić. He was the last native king of Croatia, who was since that time in a personal union with Hungary.



Ovo mi se inače čini kao dva članka.


E al sam ga smorio... ništa, od sada prepuštam ponovo ovaj topic ponosnom crnogorskom narodu (i narodnostima), i upućujem službenu ispriku radi kratkotrajne okupacije ovog prostora. 
I am going to space, and when I come back I have to pick up poodle crap.
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 18.04.2006.
Poruka: 32.357
27. listopada 2006. u 20:32
 samo ti kažem ono što sam ja u školi učio, a to je da nije vjerojatno kako je on bio kralj....a juče pročito u knjizi iz povijesti da je  hrvatskom vladao taj neki vojvoda od oste , ili tomislav II, kako mu je bilo nadjenuto, ali ne realizirano ime....naravno, ti to nisi smio učit u školi...tolerirat ću
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 15.04.2005.
Poruka: 4.798
27. listopada 2006. u 20:37
džon vejn je napisao/la:
ivan vk je napisao/la:
 Hrvatske je 1102. u±la personalnu unuju s Ugarskom tj. bila je povezana s Ugarskom samo s osobom zajedničkog vladara a kasnije su te dvije kraljevine u±le u realnu uniju s Austrijom.
Vidi cijeli citat
 gdje je potpisan  i kako se zvao taj ugovor....evo,mjesto se na madjarskom zove szekesfehervar , a ti reci na rvackom...
Vidi cijeli citat


U Biogradu na moru,Pacto Convento

Jesam u pravu,tacnije jeli google u pravu
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 18.04.2006.
Poruka: 32.357
27. listopada 2006. u 20:40
 stolni biograd, szekesfehervar.......u pravu si šorti, u pravu si!
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 11.12.2005.
Poruka: 1.535
27. listopada 2006. u 20:41

 sekesferhvar pitaj grobare dje je to  sjetice se jedno 5 puta za 90 minuta

pivolovac izgubio si kredibilitet oko istorije.

bogami gusta tekma.

ajmooooooo mraviiiiiiiiiiiiii

 

Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 20.03.2005.
Poruka: 10.655
27. listopada 2006. u 20:42
delfin je napisao/la:

 http://www.funny-games.biz/pussy-or-meat.html

ajmo mesozderi da vidimo kako poznajete kvalitet mesa

Vidi cijeli citat
 

Ma lako ovo....

Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 11.12.2005.
Poruka: 1.535
27. listopada 2006. u 20:44

 pa lako ti kad poznajes meso pa ti za razlikovat od onog drugog dovoljno

i to malo sto znas o tome

Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 11.12.2005.
Poruka: 1.535
27. listopada 2006. u 20:45
 shone jesi vido majstora.a ne ti.ti bi ubo u sniclu ladno.samo ako je krvava
BeerHunter
BeerHunter
Dokazano ovisan
Pristupio: 22.12.2005.
Poruka: 12.756
27. listopada 2006. u 20:48
delfin je napisao/la:

 sekesferhvar pitaj grobare dje je to  sjetice se jedno 5 puta za 90 minuta

pivolovac izgubio si kredibilitet oko istorije.

bogami gusta tekma.

ajmooooooo mraviiiiiiiiiiiiii

 

Vidi cijeli citat
 

nisam ja jos zavrsio na ovoj temi. Ajkulanavijas protiv Buducnosti?

Boli li tebe glava uveche, mene prskava....
Obrisan korisnik
Obrisan korisnik
Pristupio: 11.12.2005.
Poruka: 1.535
27. listopada 2006. u 20:55

 http://www.heritage.cg.yu/spomenici/duklja.htm

http://www.visit-montenegro.cg.yu/kultura/duklja.htm

Duklja/Дукля (Latin: Doclea or Diocleia) was a Slavic Serbian medieval state with hereditary lands roughly encompassing the territories of the Zeta River, Skadar Lake and the Boka bay and bordering with Travunia at Kotor. Duklja was at first a semi-independent part of the Grand Principality (Zhupanate) of Rascia (Raška) which was a vassal of the Eastern Roman Empire and later directly under Byzantine suzerainty until it won its independence in the mid-11th century, ruled by the House of Voislav (Vojislavljević). After a large fall, Doclea was incorporated into the unified Serbian state, where it remained until its last remains' falling to Ottoman hands.

slabo znam engleski.hoce li mi kauboj prevesti ovo boldirano