Jedno je sigurno ako Britanci uspiju za njima idu Danci i Francuzi, ako ne uspiju više ovakvih scenarija naćemo gledati...
Što se ostatka tiče EU je stavila Rusiju pod sankcije i sada joj je otišla Britanija koja je nosila 15% BDP-a EU.

Ako se pročitaju članci po novinama vidi se kako se Britima nabija strah i kako se traži ponovni referendum, jel to od nekud poznato?
Uglavnom u EU ostajemo redom Mi,Bugari,Rumunji,Baltičke zemlje(Lat,Lit i Est kojih ima ukupno 5 miliona) zatim Grci,Španjolci i ekonomski potonuli Talijani.
Ako se uzme da su tu Švedi koji su primili 160 000 migranata samo zadnje godine koji im stvaraju ogroman trošak te Danci koji baš ne mare previše za EU.
Očigledno je da je EU više manje Njemačka sa ovim nakupinama naroda gdje je većina u ekonomskom rasulu, a oni koji stoje bolje njih je briga za EU.
Pravi udari tek slijede kako za Britance tako za EU dapače Unija bi mogla biti pod daleko većim udarom ...

Što se nas tiče mi nismo ni izašli iz krize, sa Slovencima i Talijanima imamo najmanji udio trgovije i odnosa sa Britanijom na razini 4.Koliko se sjećam oko 0,5% BDP tj izvoz je oko 205 mil, a uvoz iz Brit 210 mil prema podacima iz 2014.godine.Tako da ako dođe nova kriza naši političari su nas pripremili ništa nas ne može iznenaditi

Kaj se tice Italije, Renci traži od EU da Italija prestane štediti.Dosta im je štednje. Hoce svoj feragosto. Vidimo da se broj Talijana na ljetovanju u Hrvatskoj prepolovijo.

nakon sto je Cameron dao ostavku jer referendum nije prosao onako kako se on zalagao (nesto nevidjeno na potezu istocno od Beca), cini se da ce Englezi smijenit i sefa opozicije

naime, laburisti su inace eurofilna stranka, ali njihov celnik Jeremy Corbyn je euroskeptik (s marksistickih pozicija). Sad ga vlastita stranka napada da se zbog njegove pasivnosti stranka nije dovoljno angazirala tijekom predreferendumske kampanje. Prema Corbynovim kriticarima, laburisti nisu svojim biracima dovoljno objasnjavali prednosti EU i pozitivne stvari ostanka, pa su njihovi glasaci (izmedju ostalih, najveci dio sirotinje) popusili pricu kako ce lova koja danas ide u EU, izlaskom iz iste krenuti prema zdravstvu i socijali, te su glasali za izlazak. Mozes mislit koliko je konzervativcima stalo do zdravstva i socijale . Krenuo je unutarstranacki ustanak protiv Corbyna i 11 clanova vlade u sjeni je dalo ostavku, sto je uvod u izglasavanje nepovjerenja predsjedniku stranke



moze se mislit o Englezima sto god, ali politicka kultura im je za duboki naklon i tiho strahopostovanje

This comment on the Guardian blog is going viral. Is it really possible that Brexit won't actually happen?

...If Boris Johnson looked downbeat yesterday, that is because he realises that he has lost.

Perhaps many Brexiters do not realise it yet, but they have actually lost, and it is all down to one man: David Cameron.

With one fell swoop yesterday at 9:15 am, Cameron effectively annulled the referendum result, and simultaneously destroyed the political careers of Boris Johnson, Michael Gove and leading Brexiters who cost him so much anguish, not to mention his premiership.

How?

Throughout the campaign, Cameron had repeatedly said that a vote for leave would lead to triggering Article 50 straight away. Whether implicitly or explicitly, the image was clear: he would be giving that notice under Article 50 the morning after a vote to leave. Whether that was scaremongering or not is a bit moot now but, in the midst of the sentimental nautical references of his speech yesterday, he quietly abandoned that position and handed the responsibility over to his successor.

And as the day wore on, the enormity of that step started to sink in: the markets, Sterling, Scotland, the Irish border, the Gibraltar border, the frontier at Calais, the need to continue compliance with all EU regulations for a free market, re-issuing passports, Brits abroad, EU citizens in Britain, the mountain of legistlation to be torn up and rewritten ... the list grew and grew.

The referendum result is not binding. It is advisory. Parliament is not bound to commit itself in that same direction.

The Conservative party election that Cameron triggered will now have one question looming over it: will you, if elected as party leader, trigger the notice under Article 50?

Who will want to have the responsibility of all those ramifications and consequences on his/her head and shoulders?

Boris Johnson knew this yesterday, when he emerged subdued from his home and was even more subdued at the press conference. He has been out-maneouvered and check-mated.

If he runs for leadership of the party, and then fails to follow through on triggering Article 50, then he is finished. If he does not run and effectively abandons the field, then he is finished. If he runs, wins and pulls the UK out of the EU, then it will all be over - Scotland will break away, there will be upheaval in Ireland, a recession ... broken trade agreements. Then he is also finished. Boris Johnson knows all of this. When he acts like the dumb blond it is just that: an act.

The Brexit leaders now have a result that they cannot use. For them, leadership of the Tory party has become a poison chalice.

When Boris Johnson said there was no need to trigger Article 50 straight away, what he really meant to say was "never". When Michael Gove went on and on about "informal negotiations" ... why? why not the formal ones straight away? ... he also meant not triggering the formal departure. They both know what a formal demarche would mean: an irreversible step that neither of them is prepared to take.

All that remains is for someone to have the guts to stand up and say that Brexit is unachievable in reality without an enormous amount of pain and destruction, that cannot be borne. And David Cameron has put the onus of making that statement on the heads of the people who led the Brexit campaign.

veceras je Johnson izjavio da je njegova predodzba Brexita takva, da ce UK ostati u nesto labavijoj vezi s EU. Po uzoru na Norvesku i Svicarsku. "Nesto labavije" nije to za sto su ljudi davali glasove protiv. Kampanja za izlazak se nije temeljila na "necem labavijem", vec na prekidu svih veza. "Nesto labavije" isto tako znaci hrpu regulacije odozgo iz Bruxellesa, kako se vidi na primjeru Norveske. UK bi zeljela zajednicko trziste s EU i suradnju sto se tice financiranja znanosti, kulture, zastite okolisa, sveucilista itd., ali da se igra po engleskim pravilima To nece dobit nikad

Ne. Najvise zato sto to ne ukljucuje slobodni pad funte (pada vrijednost dionice, al pada i funta na kojoj su bazirane). A i podaci su od petka.

Oporaviće se VB od svega, samo što će im za to trebat 20 god. 

Mislim da je očigledno što je kratkoročno (bila) bolja odluka, em plasiraju proizvode na eu tržište, em su ovisni o eu što se tiće turista i radne snage, a dugoročno ko živ ko mrtav, prije su bili solo mogu opet, samo će živjet skuplje.