Daruvar je napisao/la:
U petomu setu, pri rezultatu 4:4 i Stanovoj prednosti, Novak je ubacio drugi servis.
Staniša opalio, ali je loptica proglašena autom.
Đoković ni da pisne, sudac griješi tvrdeći da je aut, a Staniša ne traži challenge.
Poslije se ispostavilo da je loptica bila dobra.
E, moj Staniša...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=OM7AgCC2uJE#t=285hold, being broken right back the next game. Wawrinka had four break points at 4-4 in the final set, but lost two on unforced errors and one on a forehand return of serve that apparently just landed out. Wawrinka looked to confirm the call by looking to chair umpire Enric Molina who nodded in agreement with the call and Wawrinka chose not to challenge the call on the Hawk-Eye replay system. However, the ESPN2 TV replay from Hawk-Eye revealed the ball did land on the line and Wawrinka would have received another break point chance had he challenged, but not given the point since Djokovic had a play on the ball. Djokovic then held serve two points later and then broke through to victory on his third match point in the climatic 24
th game.
http://www.worldtennismagazine.com/archives/8865E, moj Staniša....Sudac mu je sugerirao da je lopta vani i on ga je poslušao i nije tražio challenge. Izgleda je sudac bio pod dojmom Đokovića koji je isto pokazivao da je lopta vani. Zašto Đoković i sudac tako reagiraju tako ako nisu sigurni !? Koliko igrača ide protiv sugestije suca da je lopta vani ?