Mislim da su ipak Ninersi pobjednici tog fiktivnog drafta...da su tako birali vjerojatno bi imali 2-3 titule u zadnjih par godina, Kaepernicku unatoč.

znam da ste već donjeli svoje mišljenje o ovom ali ipak...
http://wellsreportcontext.com/

Najbolji dio:

Click here for Nobel Laureate Roderick MacKinnon’s scientific conclusion.


Samo sto su prvo zaboravili reci da mu je Kraft bio jedan od prvih investora u njegovoj kompaniji pa su onda na brzinu dodali

Ako ovo vjeruje, imam nekog princa iz Nigerije za njih da treba neki novac prebaciti.

McNally: Tom sucks…im going make that next ball a fuckin balloon

Jastremski: Talked to him last night. He actually brought you up and said you must have a lot of stress trying to get them done…

This single text and the reference to “him” and “he,” which the investigators concluded must refer to Mr. Brady, is the lynchpin of the investigator’s conclusion that Mr. Brady was probably “generally aware” of a scheme to release air from the footballs. (pg. 78). There are two levels of speculation here. First is the speculation that the references are in fact a conversation Mr. Jastremski had with Mr. Brady and not with someone else. Second is the speculation that, even if it does refer to a conversation with Mr. Brady, any expressions of concern about Mr. McNally’s level of “stress” had to do with Mr. McNally’s improper deflation of footballs. Neither the sender nor the recipient of this text supported the report’s interpretation. Nor does the language of the text. Nor is there any other corroborative evidence.

It being a reference to Mr. Brady is also inconsistent with Mr. Brady’s expressed testimony that he never had any reason to — or did — express concern over any “stress” Mr. McNally had. Mr. Jastremski frequently sent texts which did not relate to either a prior text that he sent or the prior text that he received — the investigators have extensive texts from him to various people on numerous subjects and this pattern was apparent. Numerous examples were called to their attention. This pattern of Mr. Jastremski’s texting is disregarded in the report.

The “him” and “he” was in fact Mr. Jastremski’s friend, as the investigators were told, and the conversation involved issues relating to Mr. McNally’s stress relating to reselling family tickets. As Mr. McNally explained, his sister is in charge of the family’s long-held Patriots seasons tickets, and she has developing health issues.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/sports/football/patriots-the-deflator-was-trying-to-lose-weight-no/nmGhS/ Jeste li vi ozbiljni????? kako ih nije sramota

ma tragikomicno je. totti valjda trola s tim, ne vidim drugo objasnjenje. rekoh vec, koda smo u vrticu.

sve skupa sa kolicinom gluposti nadilazi samu tematiku prekrsaja.

ovaj pristup stvari kao da se radi o krivicnom suđenju je isto smijesan i jedino je bitan NE i doticnim fanovima.
nama kojima su oni jedna od 32 ekipe nije bitan. jer je ocito da su muljali, a jedino sto mi je bitno kao gledatelju sastrane je da ekipe imaju iste pocetne uvjete sto je bit svakog sporta.
u silnom prepucavanju po medijima nisam nigdje vidio izjavu "nismo to radili", nego "nemoze se dokazati da smo to radili ali drugi su to isto radili".
to je (nevezano uz misljenje o loptama) "not good enough" za gigantski biznis koji pociva na ideji da ja ako hocu legalno gledat u hr moram iskrcat 300$ ili koliko li je vec godisnja cifra i pritom nemoram mislit gledam li muljatorski HNL ili vrhunski NFL.
jedna si od 32 ekipe koja zarađuje smijesne iznose i imas deflatora u ekipi. to ne prolazi u amerikama jebiga.
to nazalost po NE povlaci kaznu za koju nas u nacelu isto nije previse briga, ali barem imas dojam da se to vise nece dogadjat. a ono sto je najbitnije za foteljske guzonje u cijeloj toj prici je da mi imamo dojam da se to vise nece dogadjat i da im pljunemo tih 300$.

daleko od toga da se liga nije izblamirala u svemu tome, ali nisu ni u NE nista bolji.

Recimo da izostavimo to obješnjenje za naziv "Deflator" , to ipak ne mijenja činjenicu da je Wellsov izvještaj pun kontradiktornosti i da uzima u obzir ono kaj mu paše, a odbacuje ono kaj mu ne paše. iz izvještaja se vidi da je proces počel s pretpostavkom da su Patsi krivi i da je išel samo za tim da nađe "dokaze" koji bi potvrdili tu pretpostavku.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/05/10/wells-report-disregards-andersons-best-recollection-on-a-key-piece-of-evidence/

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/05/10/pressure-gauge-discrepancies-undermine-wells-report/

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/05/12/deflategate-investigators-say-it-doesnt-matter-which-gauge-was-used/

i sad ti vjeruj tom tipu koji prihvaća samo dokaze koji mu pašu u konstrukciji njegovog slučaja